Lingfield Park racecourse statistics for the all-weather flat course.
The statisticians here at One Stop Racing have compiled a wealth of data for the All-Weather course at Lingfield Park.
Scroll down and you will discover Lingfield (AW) Favourite Statistics, Lingfield (AW) Draw Analysis, Lingfield (AW) leading Jockey, Trainer and Sire data.
Lingfield Favourite Statistics
All these statistics were independently collected by us over the last 5 years.
| Bets | Wins | P/L | Win% | Places | Place% | |
| All Favs | 2244 | 745 | -200 | 33% | 1405 | 63% |
| Outright Favs | 1951 | 683 | -153 | 35% | 1270 | 65% |
| Joint Favs | 262 | 56 | -42 | 21% | 120 | 46% |
| Co Favs | 31 | 6 | -5 | 19% | 15 | 48% |
| 2nd Favs | 2180 | 449 | -219 | 21% | 1084 | 50% |
Lingfield All-Weather draw analysis
All these statistics were independently collected by us from 1st January 2011 to the present day.
To qualify for our analysis races must have a minimum of 8 runners.
We have tracked which stall the winner and placed horses came from in every qualifying race, we only collect data on 3 places despite the size of the field or any bookmakers offering extra places in a specific races.
In the case of 2 horses dead heating for 1st place both are counted as winners.
For the number of wins and places that each stall has, wins are included as places, so if a stall has 2 wins and 4 places, that stall has technically placed 6 times, when we calculate the place percentage of a certain stall we will include wins in those statistics. All percentages have been calculated on how many times that stall has been used.
5f
6f
7f
1m
1m 2f
1m 4f
1m 5f
1m 7½f
2m
Lingfield (AW) 5 furlong draw analysis.
We tracked 274 races, in total there were 2461 runners.
| Bets | Wins | Win% | P/L(SP) | Places | Place% | Races |
| 2461 | 275 | 11.17 | -486.25 | 826 | 33.56 | 274 |
Draw data broken down by stall
This illustrates the Lingfield (AW) draw bias for 5 furlongs
| Stall | Bets | Wins | Win% | P/L(SP) | Places | Place% | Races |
| 1 | 261 | 34 | 13.03 | -61.59 | 112 | 42.91 | 261 |
| 2 | 265 | 38 | 14.34 | -4.78 | 107 | 40.38 | 265 |
| 3 | 268 | 23 | 8.58 | -138.63 | 85 | 31.72 | 268 |
| 4 | 265 | 21 | 7.92 | -145.68 | 92 | 34.72 | 265 |
| 5 | 270 | 40 | 14.81 | 34.72 | 93 | 34.44 | 270 |
| 6 | 268 | 26 | 9.7 | -34.4 | 84 | 31.34 | 268 |
| 7 | 259 | 34 | 13.13 | -20.84 | 92 | 35.52 | 259 |
| 8 | 251 | 29 | 11.55 | -50.38 | 73 | 29.08 | 251 |
| 9 | 206 | 18 | 8.74 | -55.17 | 50 | 24.27 | 206 |
| 10 | 148 | 12 | 8.11 | -9.5 | 38 | 25.68 | 148 |
Running style analysis
Analysis of running style using last 200 races in Lingfield (AW) races at distance of 5furlongs.
| Running Style | Runners | Wins | Strike Rate | P/L (SP) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Front Runner | 276 | 77 | 27.9% | 161.85 |
| Prominent | 417 | 70 | 16.79% | 23.17 |
| Tracked/Chased | 288 | 22 | 7.64% | -145.61 |
| Mid Division | 45 | 3 | 6.67% | -34.00 |
| Held Up | 432 | 29 | 6.71% | -266.99 |
| Poor Start | 79 | 0 | 0% | -79.00 |
Lingfield (AW) 6 furlong draw analysis.
We tracked 557 races, in total there were 5560 runners.
| Bets | Wins | Win% | P/L(SP) | Places | Place% | Races |
| 5560 | 558 | 10.04 | -1686.76 | 1676 | 30.14 | 557 |
Draw data broken down by stall
This illustrates the Lingfield (AW) draw bias for 6 furlongs
| Stall | Bets | Wins | Win% | P/L(SP) | Places | Place% | Races |
| 1 | 539 | 55 | 10.2 | -166.56 | 182 | 33.77 | 539 |
| 2 | 532 | 71 | 13.35 | -30.69 | 194 | 36.47 | 532 |
| 3 | 526 | 65 | 12.36 | -69.17 | 170 | 32.32 | 526 |
| 4 | 543 | 60 | 11.05 | -118.41 | 182 | 33.52 | 543 |
| 5 | 537 | 55 | 10.24 | -204.07 | 162 | 30.17 | 537 |
| 6 | 534 | 58 | 10.86 | -148.65 | 180 | 33.71 | 534 |
| 7 | 524 | 49 | 9.35 | -214.59 | 155 | 29.58 | 524 |
| 8 | 524 | 52 | 9.92 | -147.68 | 163 | 31.11 | 524 |
| 9 | 459 | 43 | 9.37 | -124.95 | 103 | 22.44 | 459 |
| 10 | 362 | 19 | 5.25 | -233.49 | 78 | 21.55 | 362 |
| 11 | 277 | 18 | 6.5 | -130.5 | 60 | 21.66 | 277 |
| 12 | 198 | 13 | 6.57 | -93 | 45 | 22.73 | 198 |
| 13 | 2 | 0 | 0 | -2 | 2 | 100 | 2 |
| 14 | 3 | 0 | 0 | -3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
Running style analysis
Analysis of running style using last 200 races in Lingfield (AW) races at distance of 6 furlongs
| Running Style | Runners | Wins | Strike Rate | P/L (SP) |
| Front Runner | 278 | 59 | 21.22% | 37.01 |
| Prominent | 391 | 64 | 16.37% | -11.50 |
| Tracked/Chased | 340 | 32 | 9.41% | -150.86 |
| Mid Division | 82 | 3 | 3.66% | -61.00 |
| Held Up | 562 | 41 | 7.3% | -289.74 |
| Poor Start | 58 | 1 | 1.72% | -54.00 |
Lingfield (AW) 7 furlong draw analysis.
We tracked 691 races, in total there were 7348 runners.
| Bets | Wins | Win% | P/L(SP) | Places | Place% | Races |
| 7348 | 694 | 9.44 | -2134.65 | 2074 | 28.23 | 691 |
Draw data broken down by stall
This illustrates the Lingfield (AW) draw bias for 7 furlongs
| Stall | Bets | Wins | Win% | P/L(SP) | Places | Place% | Races |
| 1 | 654 | 61 | 9.33 | -186.17 | 208 | 31.8 | 654 |
| 2 | 658 | 46 | 6.99 | -236.48 | 182 | 27.66 | 658 |
| 3 | 654 | 73 | 11.16 | -74.28 | 214 | 32.72 | 654 |
| 4 | 653 | 63 | 9.65 | -174.78 | 179 | 27.41 | 653 |
| 5 | 654 | 69 | 10.55 | -131.61 | 193 | 29.51 | 654 |
| 6 | 658 | 70 | 10.64 | -214.54 | 207 | 31.46 | 658 |
| 7 | 657 | 59 | 8.98 | -230.82 | 185 | 28.16 | 657 |
| 8 | 667 | 67 | 10.05 | -240.41 | 196 | 29.39 | 667 |
| 9 | 601 | 65 | 10.82 | -165.23 | 165 | 27.45 | 601 |
| 10 | 486 | 40 | 8.23 | -196.99 | 117 | 24.07 | 486 |
| 11 | 360 | 30 | 8.33 | -92.22 | 83 | 23.06 | 360 |
| 12 | 282 | 29 | 10.28 | -29.75 | 71 | 25.18 | 282 |
| 13 | 213 | 13 | 6.1 | -124.5 | 45 | 21.13 | 213 |
| 14 | 149 | 9 | 6.04 | -34.87 | 29 | 19.46 | 149 |
| 15 | 1 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 16 | 1 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Running style analysis
Analysis of running style using last 200 races in Lingfield (AW) races at distance of 7 furlongs
| Running Style | Runners | Wins | Strike Rate | P/L (SP) |
| Front Runner | 276 | 59 | 21.38% | 35.71 |
| Prominent | 411 | 59 | 14.36% | -9.53 |
| Tracked/Chased | 373 | 40 | 10.72% | -35.81 |
| Mid Division | 117 | 4 | 3.42% | -80.37 |
| Held Up | 680 | 37 | 5.44% | -444.29 |
| Poor Start | 53 | 1 | 1.89% | -45.00 |
Lingfield (AW) 1 mile draw analysis.
We tracked 720 races, in total there were 7224 runners.
| Bets | Wins | Win% | P/L(SP) | Places | Place% | Races |
| 7224 | 723 | 10.01 | -1983.01 | 2163 | 29.94 | 720 |
Draw data broken down by stall
This illustrates the Lingfield (AW) draw bias for 1 mile.
| Stall | Bets | Wins | Win% | P/L(SP) | Places | Place% | Races |
| 1 | 686 | 74 | 10.79 | -233.87 | 183 | 26.68 | 686 |
| 2 | 694 | 67 | 9.65 | -245.66 | 228 | 32.85 | 694 |
| 3 | 695 | 67 | 9.64 | -227.39 | 208 | 29.93 | 695 |
| 4 | 688 | 67 | 9.74 | -222.3 | 221 | 32.12 | 688 |
| 5 | 690 | 69 | 10 | -229.74 | 195 | 28.26 | 690 |
| 6 | 688 | 82 | 11.92 | -117.64 | 210 | 30.52 | 688 |
| 7 | 694 | 61 | 8.79 | -223.94 | 217 | 31.27 | 694 |
| 8 | 692 | 78 | 11.27 | -124.29 | 224 | 32.37 | 692 |
| 9 | 610 | 64 | 10.49 | -71.8 | 183 | 30 | 610 |
| 10 | 491 | 46 | 9.37 | -85.62 | 137 | 27.9 | 491 |
| 11 | 344 | 32 | 9.3 | -70.26 | 103 | 29.94 | 344 |
| 12 | 245 | 16 | 6.53 | -123.5 | 54 | 22.04 | 245 |
| 13 | 3 | 0 | 0 | -3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| 14 | 4 | 0 | 0 | -4 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
Running style analysis
Analysis of running style using last 200 races in Lingfield (AW) races at distance of 1 mile
| Running Style | Runners | Wins | Strike Rate | P/L (SP) |
| Front Runner | 278 | 48 | 17.27% | 34.15 |
| Prominent | 393 | 39 | 9.92% | -171.81 |
| Tracked/Chased | 368 | 44 | 11.96% | -79.13 |
| Mid Division | 96 | 7 | 7.29% | -42.62 |
| Held Up | 688 | 60 | 8.72% | -211.01 |
| Poor Start | 54 | 2 | 3.7% | -29.50 |
Lingfield (AW) 1 mile 2 furlongs draw analysis.
We tracked 596 races, in total there were 6289 runners.
| Bets | Wins | Win% | P/L(SP) | Places | Place% | Races |
| 6289 | 597 | 9.49 | -1672.72 | 1791 | 28.48 | 596 |
Draw data broken down by stall
This illustrates the Lingfield (AW) draw bias for 1 mile 2 furlongs.
| Stall | Bets | Wins | Win% | P/L(SP) | Places | Place% | Races |
| 1 | 567 | 60 | 10.58 | -64.68 | 177 | 31.22 | 567 |
| 2 | 569 | 63 | 11.07 | -109.25 | 174 | 30.58 | 569 |
| 3 | 577 | 54 | 9.36 | -230.66 | 167 | 28.94 | 577 |
| 4 | 565 | 65 | 11.5 | 26.58 | 191 | 33.81 | 565 |
| 5 | 575 | 53 | 9.22 | -260.11 | 173 | 30.09 | 575 |
| 6 | 559 | 48 | 8.59 | -256.76 | 158 | 28.26 | 559 |
| 7 | 570 | 76 | 13.33 | -43.64 | 184 | 32.28 | 570 |
| 8 | 570 | 44 | 7.72 | -164.55 | 156 | 27.37 | 570 |
| 9 | 494 | 43 | 8.7 | -102.7 | 133 | 26.92 | 494 |
| 10 | 409 | 29 | 7.09 | -230.58 | 98 | 23.96 | 409 |
| 11 | 317 | 20 | 6.31 | -138.75 | 73 | 23.03 | 317 |
| 12 | 234 | 20 | 8.55 | -72.45 | 48 | 20.51 | 234 |
| 13 | 175 | 11 | 6.29 | -72.55 | 37 | 21.14 | 175 |
| 14 | 108 | 11 | 10.19 | 47.38 | 22 | 20.37 | 108 |
Running style analysis
Analysis of running style using last 200 races in Lingfield (AW) races at distance of 1 mile 2 furlongs
| Running Style | Runners | Wins | Strike Rate | P/L (SP) |
| Front Runner | 252 | 40 | 15.87% | 8.21 |
| Prominent | 399 | 59 | 14.79% | 8.98 |
| Tracked/Chased | 372 | 37 | 9.95% | -68.75 |
| Mid Division | 100 | 9 | 9% | -59.17 |
| Held Up | 660 | 53 | 8.03% | -325.98 |
| Poor Start | 47 | 2 | 4.26% | -40.87 |
Lingfield (AW) 1 mile 4 furlongs draw analysis.
We tracked 341 races, in total there were 3494 runners.
| Bets | Wins | Win% | P/L(SP) | Places | Place% | Races |
| 3494 | 343 | 9.82 | -1006.63 | 1037 | 29.68 | 341 |
Draw data broken down by stall
This illustrates the Lingfield (AW) draw bias for 1 mile 4 furlongs.
| Stall | Bets | Wins | Win% | P/L(SP) | Places | Place% | Races |
| 1 | 320 | 29 | 9.06 | -70.51 | 88 | 27.5 | 320 |
| 2 | 326 | 31 | 9.51 | -84.84 | 99 | 30.37 | 326 |
| 3 | 331 | 34 | 10.27 | -39.29 | 109 | 32.93 | 331 |
| 4 | 327 | 34 | 10.4 | -80.5 | 96 | 29.36 | 327 |
| 5 | 322 | 45 | 13.98 | -33.93 | 103 | 31.99 | 322 |
| 6 | 331 | 32 | 9.67 | -133.56 | 109 | 32.93 | 331 |
| 7 | 330 | 29 | 8.79 | -122.25 | 110 | 33.33 | 330 |
| 8 | 333 | 34 | 10.21 | -124.03 | 105 | 31.53 | 333 |
| 9 | 261 | 24 | 9.2 | -79.35 | 69 | 26.44 | 261 |
| 10 | 199 | 20 | 10.05 | -58.37 | 56 | 28.14 | 199 |
| 11 | 146 | 12 | 8.22 | -63.25 | 29 | 19.86 | 146 |
| 12 | 102 | 9 | 8.82 | -20 | 27 | 26.47 | 102 |
| 13 | 65 | 3 | 4.62 | -55.75 | 14 | 21.54 | 65 |
| 14 | 49 | 2 | 4.08 | -36 | 11 | 22.45 | 49 |
| 15 | 29 | 3 | 10.34 | -8.5 | 8 | 27.59 | 29 |
| 16 | 23 | 2 | 8.7 | 3.5 | 4 | 17.39 | 23 |
Running style analysis
Analysis of running style using last 200 races in Lingfield (AW) races at distance of 1 mile 4 furlongs
| Running Style | Runners | Wins | Strike Rate | P/L (SP) |
| Front Runner | 268 | 40 | 14.93% | -74.68 |
| Prominent | 349 | 50 | 14.33% | -64.55 |
| Tracked/Chased | 345 | 47 | 13.62% | 25.28 |
| Mid Division | 80 | 5 | 6.25% | -53.25 |
| Held Up | 609 | 57 | 9.36% | -220.05 |
| Poor Start | 41 | 2 | 4.88% | 0.00 |
Lingfield (AW) 1 mile 5 furlongs draw analysis.
We tracked 64 races, in total there were 661 runners.
| Bets | Wins | Win% | P/L(SP) | Places | Place% | Races |
| 661 | 64 | 9.68 | -160.82 | 193 | 29.2 | 64 |
Draw data broken down by stall
This illustrates the Lingfield (AW) draw bias for 1 mile 5 furlongs.
| Stall | Bets | Wins | Win% | P/L(SP) | Places | Place% | Races |
| 1 | 63 | 7 | 11.11 | 13.5 | 19 | 30.16 | 63 |
| 2 | 62 | 7 | 11.29 | 8.75 | 23 | 37.1 | 62 |
| 3 | 62 | 6 | 9.68 | -30 | 21 | 33.87 | 62 |
| 4 | 60 | 7 | 11.67 | -6 | 20 | 33.33 | 60 |
| 5 | 59 | 5 | 8.47 | -2.5 | 15 | 25.42 | 59 |
| 6 | 62 | 4 | 6.45 | -46.95 | 15 | 24.19 | 62 |
| 7 | 60 | 7 | 11.67 | -9.75 | 19 | 31.67 | 60 |
| 8 | 62 | 4 | 6.45 | -26.5 | 19 | 30.65 | 62 |
| 9 | 51 | 7 | 13.73 | -10 | 14 | 27.45 | 51 |
| 10 | 41 | 3 | 7.32 | -17 | 13 | 31.71 | 41 |
| 11 | 30 | 4 | 13.33 | -5.62 | 8 | 26.67 | 30 |
| 12 | 22 | 2 | 9.09 | -7.75 | 3 | 13.64 | 22 |
| 13 | 17 | 1 | 5.88 | -11 | 2 | 11.76 | 17 |
| 14 | 10 | 0 | 0 | -10 | 2 | 20 | 10 |
Running style analysis
Analysis of running style using last 200 races in Lingfield (AW) races at distance of 1 mile 5 furlongs.
| Running Style | Runners | Wins | Strike Rate | P/L (SP) |
| Front Runner | 115 | 15 | 13.04% | -35.75 |
| Prominent | 216 | 27 | 12.5% | -49.58 |
| Tracked/Chased | 112 | 18 | 16.07% | 18.53 |
| Mid Division | 53 | 5 | 9.43% | 10.25 |
| Held Up | 296 | 28 | 9.46% | -63.57 |
| Poor Start | 16 | 1 | 6.25% | -12.50 |
Lingfield (AW) 1 mile 7½ furlongs draw analysis.
We tracked 31 races, in total there were 305 runners.
| Bets | Wins | Win% | P/L(SP) | Places | Place% | Races |
| 305 | 31 | 10.16 | -25.66 | 93 | 30.49 | 31 |
Draw data broken down by stall
This illustrates the Lingfield (AW) draw bias for 1 mile 7½ furlongs.
| Stall | Bets | Wins | Win% | P/L(SP) | Places | Place% | Races |
| 1 | 29 | 3 | 10.34 | -8.25 | 9 | 31.03 | 29 |
| 2 | 29 | 4 | 13.79 | -6.89 | 13 | 44.83 | 29 |
| 3 | 31 | 2 | 6.45 | -20 | 9 | 29.03 | 31 |
| 4 | 27 | 1 | 3.7 | -10 | 12 | 44.44 | 27 |
| 5 | 30 | 5 | 16.67 | 16 | 9 | 30 | 30 |
| 6 | 29 | 5 | 17.24 | 59 | 10 | 34.48 | 29 |
| 7 | 30 | 1 | 3.33 | -28 | 4 | 13.33 | 30 |
| 8 | 30 | 3 | 10 | 3 | 7 | 23.33 | 30 |
| 9 | 26 | 1 | 3.85 | -20 | 6 | 23.08 | 26 |
| 10 | 19 | 4 | 21.05 | 5.73 | 8 | 42.11 | 19 |
| 11 | 12 | 2 | 16.67 | -3.25 | 3 | 25 | 12 |
| 12 | 7 | 0 | 0 | -7 | 1 | 14.29 | 7 |
| 13 | 5 | 0 | 0 | -5 | 2 | 40 | 5 |
| 14 | 1 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Running style analysis
Analysis of running style using last 200 races in Lingfield (AW) races at distance of 1 mile 7½ furlongs.
| Running Style | Runners | Wins | Strike Rate | P/L (SP) |
| Front Runner | 66 | 17 | 25.76% | 94.69 |
| Prominent | 113 | 13 | 11.5% | -66.09 |
| Tracked/Chased | 70 | 8 | 11.43% | -36.62 |
| Mid Division | 21 | 1 | 4.76% | -14.00 |
| Held Up | 169 | 16 | 9.47% | -37.05 |
| Poor Start | 9 | 0 | 0% | -9.00 |
Lingfield (AW) 2 miles draw analysis.
We tracked 99 races, in total there were 1073 runners.
| Bets | Wins | Win% | P/L(SP) | Places | Place% | Races |
| 1073 | 99 | 9.23 | -303.97 | 297 | 27.68 | 99 |
Draw data broken down by stall
This illustrates the Lingfield (AW) draw bias for 2 miles.
| Stall | Bets | Wins | Win% | P/L(SP) | Places | Place% | Races |
| 1 | 94 | 7 | 7.45 | -28.04 | 25 | 26.6 | 94 |
| 2 | 93 | 11 | 11.83 | -42.67 | 23 | 24.73 | 93 |
| 3 | 96 | 10 | 10.42 | 0.41 | 24 | 25 | 96 |
| 4 | 96 | 12 | 12.5 | -23.5 | 28 | 29.17 | 96 |
| 5 | 95 | 4 | 4.21 | -64.75 | 28 | 29.47 | 95 |
| 6 | 94 | 5 | 5.32 | -66.5 | 19 | 20.21 | 94 |
| 7 | 94 | 12 | 12.77 | -9 | 33 | 35.11 | 94 |
| 8 | 95 | 12 | 12.63 | 4.25 | 27 | 28.42 | 95 |
| 9 | 78 | 8 | 10.26 | -14.8 | 23 | 29.49 | 78 |
| 10 | 74 | 6 | 8.11 | -40.37 | 23 | 31.08 | 74 |
| 11 | 62 | 3 | 4.84 | -17 | 18 | 29.03 | 62 |
| 12 | 43 | 7 | 16.28 | 28 | 15 | 34.88 | 43 |
| 13 | 37 | 1 | 2.7 | -29 | 3 | 8.11 | 37 |
| 14 | 22 | 1 | 4.55 | -1 | 8 | 36.36 | 22 |
Running style analysis
Analysis of running style using last 200 races in Lingfield (AW) races at distance of 2 miles.
| Running Style | Runners | Wins | Strike Rate | P/L (SP) |
| Front Runner | 196 | 17 | 8.67% | -97.93 |
| Prominent | 315 | 49 | 15.56% | -54.25 |
| Tracked/Chased | 219 | 31 | 14.16% | -4.32 |
| Mid Division | 91 | 12 | 13.19% | -15.50 |
| Held Up | 497 | 40 | 8.05% | -211.82 |
| Poor Start | 31 | 0 | 0% | -31.00 |
Lingfield (AW) Jockey, Trainer and Sire Data.
All these statistics were independently collected by us over the last 5 years. .
Key: B – Bets, W – Wins, W% – win percentage, P – Places, P% – place percentage, P/L – profit / loss (WIN ONLY) to a 1 point stake.
Jockeys
Trainers
Jockey / Trainer
Sires
To qualify a jockey has to have had a minimum of 20 rides at Lingfield (AW) in the last 5 years.
Top 100 Jockeys
| B | W | W% | P | P% | P/L | |
| Dettori, L | 34 | 17 | 50% | 25 | 74% | 16 |
| Moore, Ryan | 104 | 33 | 32% | 60 | 58% | -2 |
| Atzeni, Andrea | 88 | 26 | 30% | 44 | 50% | 24 |
| Beasley, Connor | 20 | 5 | 25% | 8 | 40% | 5 |
| Doyle, James | 132 | 33 | 25% | 79 | 60% | -16 |
| Villiers, Angus | 37 | 9 | 24% | 14 | 38% | 22 |
| Baker, George | 88 | 19 | 22% | 40 | 45% | -10 |
| Crowley, Jim | 170 | 36 | 21% | 79 | 46% | -41 |
| Fanning, Joe | 222 | 47 | 21% | 85 | 38% | 21 |
| Murphy, Oisin | 264 | 54 | 20% | 113 | 43% | -15 |
| Hart, Jason | 66 | 13 | 20% | 23 | 35% | -4 |
| Ghiani, Marco | 53 | 10 | 19% | 20 | 38% | 22 |
| Kingscote, Richard | 344 | 64 | 19% | 139 | 40% | -57 |
| Noble, Cameron | 34 | 6 | 18% | 13 | 38% | -4 |
| Cosgrave, Pat | 114 | 20 | 18% | 50 | 44% | 5 |
| Buick, William | 87 | 15 | 17% | 47 | 54% | -27 |
| Tudhope, Daniel | 41 | 7 | 17% | 16 | 39% | -11 |
| Sousa, Silvestre De | 195 | 33 | 17% | 82 | 42% | -48 |
| Kirby, Adam | 609 | 99 | 16% | 242 | 40% | -176 |
| Doyle, Hollie | 475 | 77 | 16% | 172 | 36% | -8 |
| Marquand, Tom | 461 | 71 | 15% | 157 | 34% | 65 |
| Osborne, Saffie | 26 | 4 | 15% | 7 | 27% | 10 |
| Mitchell, Jack | 262 | 40 | 15% | 92 | 35% | -93 |
| Jamin, Pierre-Louis | 53 | 8 | 15% | 16 | 30% | 3 |
| Levey, S M | 249 | 37 | 15% | 88 | 35% | -2 |
| Dawson, R | 54 | 8 | 15% | 23 | 43% | -13 |
| McNamara, Adam | 62 | 9 | 15% | 17 | 27% | 0 |
| Norton, Francis | 153 | 22 | 14% | 50 | 33% | -30 |
| Nicholls, Miss M | 28 | 4 | 14% | 10 | 36% | 13 |
| Mulrennan, Paul | 28 | 4 | 14% | 9 | 32% | -10 |
| Harley, M | 221 | 31 | 14% | 84 | 38% | -32 |
| Spencer, Jamie | 93 | 13 | 14% | 39 | 42% | -32 |
| Bass, George | 43 | 6 | 14% | 15 | 35% | 18 |
| McHugh, B | 29 | 4 | 14% | 5 | 17% | -16 |
| Havlin, Robert | 303 | 41 | 14% | 120 | 40% | -100 |
| Lee, Clifford | 37 | 5 | 14% | 13 | 35% | 22 |
| Hogan, D E | 52 | 7 | 13% | 13 | 25% | -16 |
| Edmunds, Lewis | 53 | 7 | 13% | 14 | 26% | -30 |
| Shoemark, Kieran | 258 | 34 | 13% | 85 | 33% | -65 |
| Rawlinson, Ali | 84 | 11 | 13% | 28 | 33% | -11 |
| Garritty, Jack | 23 | 3 | 13% | 12 | 52% | -8 |
| Pearson, Laura | 62 | 8 | 13% | 19 | 31% | -16 |
| Mackay, Nicky | 86 | 11 | 13% | 25 | 29% | -8 |
| Keenan, Darragh | 189 | 24 | 13% | 48 | 25% | 14 |
| Egan, John | 192 | 24 | 13% | 54 | 28% | -39 |
| Lane, Martin | 32 | 4 | 13% | 8 | 25% | -14 |
| Murtagh, Connor | 24 | 3 | 13% | 9 | 38% | 19 |
| Berry, F M | 141 | 17 | 12% | 42 | 30% | -37 |
| Whelan, Trevor | 25 | 3 | 12% | 7 | 28% | 5 |
| Clutterbuck, Rhys | 92 | 11 | 12% | 27 | 29% | -13 |
| Probert, David | 556 | 66 | 12% | 160 | 29% | -42 |
| Winston, Robert | 135 | 16 | 12% | 45 | 33% | -43 |
| Muscutt, D | 211 | 25 | 12% | 68 | 32% | -67 |
| Fallon, Cieren | 123 | 14 | 11% | 32 | 26% | -26 |
| Curtis, B A | 132 | 15 | 11% | 42 | 32% | -52 |
| Greatrex, Thomas | 53 | 6 | 11% | 14 | 26% | -1 |
| Ryan, Rossa | 216 | 24 | 11% | 71 | 33% | -39 |
| Egan, David | 109 | 12 | 11% | 37 | 34% | -28 |
| Morris, Luke | 854 | 94 | 11% | 250 | 29% | -181 |
| Williams, Levi | 28 | 3 | 11% | 6 | 21% | 18 |
| Steward, Louis | 47 | 5 | 11% | 19 | 40% | -5 |
| Murphy, Timmy | 57 | 6 | 11% | 11 | 19% | 6 |
| Wood, George | 114 | 12 | 11% | 27 | 24% | -40 |
| Cherchi, Stefano | 38 | 4 | 11% | 11 | 29% | -21 |
| Watson, Jason | 134 | 14 | 10% | 40 | 30% | -22 |
| Costello, Dougie | 163 | 17 | 10% | 40 | 25% | 19 |
| Saunders, Tyler | 29 | 3 | 10% | 7 | 24% | -11 |
| Brock, Danny | 79 | 8 | 10% | 16 | 20% | 9 |
| ONeill, Dane | 50 | 5 | 10% | 19 | 38% | -8 |
| Cronin, S C | 20 | 2 | 10% | 3 | 15% | -2 |
| Bryan, Joshua | 101 | 10 | 10% | 34 | 34% | -61 |
| Catton, Luke | 21 | 2 | 10% | 9 | 43% | 4 |
| McCullagh, Scott | 21 | 2 | 10% | 5 | 24% | -8 |
| Brown, Thomas | 21 | 2 | 10% | 6 | 29% | -1 |
| Carson, William | 253 | 24 | 9% | 62 | 25% | -19 |
| Crouch, Hector | 277 | 26 | 9% | 81 | 29% | -78 |
| Bishop, Charles | 260 | 24 | 9% | 78 | 30% | -106 |
| Queally, T P | 145 | 13 | 9% | 35 | 24% | -53 |
| Donohoe, Stephen | 213 | 19 | 9% | 53 | 25% | -61 |
| Shepherd, Callum | 337 | 30 | 9% | 80 | 24% | -120 |
| Malune, Gabriele | 45 | 4 | 9% | 11 | 24% | -1 |
| Bradley, Paddy | 136 | 12 | 9% | 35 | 26% | -32 |
| Crehan, Mark | 46 | 4 | 9% | 9 | 20% | -29 |
| McDonald, P J | 117 | 10 | 9% | 40 | 34% | -69 |
| Hamilton, Tony | 60 | 5 | 8% | 18 | 30% | -2 |
| Glass, Amelia | 24 | 2 | 8% | 7 | 29% | -7 |
| Parkes, D A | 24 | 2 | 8% | 10 | 42% | -13 |
| MacKenzie, Ellie | 36 | 3 | 8% | 10 | 28% | -4 |
| Kelly, Shane | 433 | 36 | 8% | 120 | 28% | -187 |
| Rooke, George | 158 | 13 | 8% | 40 | 25% | -84 |
| Turner, Hayley | 122 | 10 | 8% | 28 | 23% | -86 |
| ONeill, K T | 343 | 28 | 8% | 72 | 21% | -132 |
| Downing, George | 98 | 8 | 8% | 23 | 23% | 25 |
| McEntee, Grace | 74 | 6 | 8% | 24 | 32% | -23 |
| Hanagan, Paul | 38 | 3 | 8% | 14 | 37% | -19 |
| Keniry, L P | 368 | 29 | 8% | 92 | 25% | -149 |
| Hutchinson, Callum | 39 | 3 | 8% | 9 | 23% | -22 |
| Hornby, Rob | 209 | 16 | 8% | 48 | 23% | -86 |
| Beschizza,Adam | 53 | 4 | 8% | 15 | 28% | -7 |
| Hansen, Thore | 81 | 6 | 7% | 26 | 32% | -28 |
To qualify a trainer has to have had a minimum of 20 runners at Lingfield (AW) in the last 5 years.
Top 100 Trainers
| B | W | W% | P | P% | P/L | |
| King, N B | 21 | 7 | 33% | 9 | 43% | 13 |
| Suroor, Saeed Bin | 67 | 20 | 30% | 42 | 63% | 4 |
| Stoute, Sir Michael | 68 | 20 | 29% | 37 | 54% | 17 |
| Appleby, Charlie | 68 | 19 | 28% | 35 | 51% | -10 |
| Varian, Roger | 116 | 32 | 28% | 63 | 54% | 14 |
| Gosden, J H M | 220 | 57 | 26% | 130 | 59% | -18 |
| Littmoden, N P | 55 | 14 | 25% | 24 | 44% | 6 |
| Haggas, W J | 137 | 34 | 25% | 74 | 54% | -9 |
| Burrows, Owen | 29 | 7 | 24% | 18 | 62% | -3 |
| Pearce, Simon | 25 | 6 | 24% | 10 | 40% | 71 |
| Cumani, L M | 21 | 5 | 24% | 8 | 38% | 17 |
| Crisford, Simon | 108 | 24 | 22% | 53 | 49% | -21 |
| Watson, Archie | 299 | 65 | 22% | 133 | 44% | -4 |
| Johnston, M | 356 | 76 | 21% | 146 | 41% | 13 |
| Dascombe, Tom | 96 | 20 | 21% | 34 | 35% | -12 |
| Lanigan, D R | 24 | 5 | 21% | 9 | 38% | 13 |
| Quinn, J J | 30 | 6 | 20% | 13 | 43% | -2 |
| Powell, B G | 36 | 7 | 19% | 11 | 31% | 45 |
| Charlton, R | 100 | 19 | 19% | 39 | 39% | -20 |
| Fanshawe, J R | 108 | 20 | 19% | 41 | 38% | -20 |
| Smith, Martin | 50 | 9 | 18% | 15 | 30% | 48 |
| Hills, Charles | 151 | 27 | 18% | 54 | 36% | -15 |
| Boughey, George | 46 | 8 | 17% | 21 | 46% | 27 |
| Palmer, Hugo | 138 | 24 | 17% | 53 | 38% | -31 |
| Eyre, J L | 30 | 5 | 17% | 9 | 30% | -7 |
| Beckett, R M | 141 | 23 | 16% | 49 | 35% | -41 |
| Durack, S | 37 | 6 | 16% | 12 | 32% | -0 |
| Prescott, Sir Mark | 118 | 19 | 16% | 46 | 39% | -40 |
| Auvray, Jean-Rene | 25 | 4 | 16% | 10 | 40% | -4 |
| Eddery, Robert | 44 | 7 | 16% | 14 | 32% | -4 |
| Loughnane, David | 101 | 16 | 16% | 40 | 40% | -15 |
| Elsworth, D R C | 115 | 18 | 16% | 39 | 34% | -3 |
| Hannon (Jnr), Richard | 414 | 64 | 15% | 155 | 37% | -25 |
| Ferguson, James | 26 | 4 | 15% | 14 | 54% | -15 |
| Hodgson, Simon | 26 | 4 | 15% | 10 | 38% | 6 |
| Bell, M L W | 79 | 12 | 15% | 34 | 43% | -10 |
| Balding, A M | 212 | 32 | 15% | 68 | 32% | -61 |
| Spencer, Richard | 94 | 14 | 15% | 29 | 31% | 13 |
| Mulholland, N P | 47 | 7 | 15% | 16 | 34% | -21 |
| Wigham, M | 74 | 11 | 15% | 27 | 36% | -14 |
| Mohammed, Ismail | 48 | 7 | 15% | 12 | 25% | -24 |
| Meehan, B J | 69 | 10 | 14% | 22 | 32% | -13 |
| Gask, J R | 42 | 6 | 14% | 17 | 40% | -21 |
| Scargill, Dr J D | 21 | 3 | 14% | 5 | 24% | -10 |
| Griffiths, D C | 65 | 9 | 14% | 17 | 26% | -27 |
| Moubarak, Mohamed | 29 | 4 | 14% | 13 | 45% | 6 |
| Baker, George | 133 | 18 | 14% | 46 | 35% | 16 |
| Murphy, Mike | 37 | 5 | 14% | 11 | 30% | -9 |
| Ryan, K A | 30 | 4 | 13% | 9 | 30% | -7 |
| OMeara, D | 211 | 28 | 13% | 76 | 36% | -42 |
| Chapple-Hyam, Jane | 91 | 12 | 13% | 28 | 31% | -17 |
| Williams, Ian | 137 | 18 | 13% | 37 | 27% | -16 |
| Crate, Peter | 46 | 6 | 13% | 14 | 30% | 27 |
| Kittow, W S | 23 | 3 | 13% | 6 | 26% | -2 |
| Stone, W B | 77 | 10 | 13% | 29 | 38% | -10 |
| Banham, Chelsea | 54 | 7 | 13% | 17 | 31% | 7 |
| Tate, James | 93 | 12 | 13% | 40 | 43% | -32 |
| Cole, P F I | 70 | 9 | 13% | 22 | 31% | -11 |
| Butler, John | 210 | 27 | 13% | 55 | 26% | -26 |
| Dwyer, C A | 47 | 6 | 13% | 13 | 28% | -2 |
| Knight, W J | 143 | 18 | 13% | 52 | 36% | -6 |
| Kubler, Daniel | 32 | 4 | 13% | 10 | 31% | -16 |
| Cowell, R M H | 112 | 14 | 13% | 36 | 32% | -60 |
| Hodges, R J | 33 | 4 | 12% | 8 | 24% | 1 |
| Hedger, P R | 67 | 8 | 12% | 25 | 37% | -13 |
| Tregoning, M P | 67 | 8 | 12% | 21 | 31% | -29 |
| Tuite, Joseph | 93 | 11 | 12% | 25 | 27% | 37 |
| Fellowes, Charlie | 110 | 13 | 12% | 37 | 34% | -46 |
| Channon, M R | 161 | 19 | 12% | 59 | 37% | -53 |
| Gallagher, J | 51 | 6 | 12% | 13 | 25% | 37 |
| Moore, G L | 308 | 36 | 12% | 97 | 31% | -57 |
| Cox, C G | 137 | 16 | 12% | 46 | 34% | -56 |
| Phelan, P M | 156 | 18 | 12% | 45 | 29% | -41 |
| Frost, Kevin | 26 | 3 | 12% | 8 | 31% | -11 |
| Clover, Tom | 78 | 9 | 12% | 23 | 29% | -31 |
| Noseda, J | 26 | 3 | 12% | 8 | 31% | -21 |
| DArcy, P W | 26 | 3 | 12% | 8 | 31% | 7 |
| Osborne, J A | 217 | 25 | 12% | 65 | 30% | -42 |
| Dow, S | 331 | 38 | 11% | 110 | 33% | -37 |
| Simcock, D M | 158 | 18 | 11% | 48 | 30% | -56 |
| Williams, S C | 177 | 20 | 11% | 54 | 31% | -37 |
| Hughes, Richard | 266 | 30 | 11% | 97 | 36% | -120 |
| Muir, W R | 98 | 11 | 11% | 37 | 38% | 30 |
| Perrett,s A J | 198 | 22 | 11% | 67 | 34% | -89 |
| Wintle, A | 27 | 3 | 11% | 11 | 41% | 9 |
| Furtado, Ivan | 63 | 7 | 11% | 13 | 21% | -40 |
| Walker, Ed | 182 | 20 | 11% | 66 | 36% | -65 |
| Ryan, J | 101 | 11 | 11% | 32 | 32% | -28 |
| Evans, P D | 313 | 34 | 11% | 97 | 31% | -98 |
| Murphy, Amy | 111 | 12 | 11% | 27 | 24% | -21 |
| Appleby, M | 205 | 22 | 11% | 61 | 30% | -25 |
| Stronge, Ali | 85 | 9 | 11% | 19 | 22% | 8 |
| King, A | 105 | 11 | 10% | 34 | 32% | -23 |
| Burke, K R | 67 | 7 | 10% | 19 | 28% | -8 |
| Hughes, Jo | 29 | 3 | 10% | 9 | 31% | -9 |
| Johnson, B R | 116 | 12 | 10% | 40 | 34% | -35 |
| Murphy, Olly | 29 | 3 | 10% | 12 | 41% | -22 |
| Dunlop, H J L | 107 | 11 | 10% | 28 | 26% | 9 |
| McEntee, P S | 156 | 16 | 10% | 44 | 28% | -70 |
| Houghton, Eve Johnson | 147 | 15 | 10% | 48 | 33% | -43 |
To qualify a jockey and trainer combination has to have teamed up in a minimum of 20 races at Lingfield (AW) in the last 5 years.
Top 100 Jockey / Trainer Combinations
| Jockey | Trainer | B | W | W% | P | P% | P/L |
| Dettori, L | Gosden, J H M | 20 | 11 | 55% | 16 | 80% | 11 |
| Atzeni, Andrea | Varian, Roger | 26 | 11 | 42% | 18 | 69% | 26 |
| Kingscote, Richard | Williams, Ian | 20 | 8 | 40% | 10 | 50% | 26 |
| Doyle, James | Palmer, Hugo | 24 | 8 | 33% | 10 | 42% | 8 |
| Doyle, Hollie | Watson, Archie | 87 | 26 | 30% | 43 | 49% | -3 |
| Morris, Luke | Carroll, A W | 27 | 8 | 30% | 13 | 48% | 36 |
| Havlin, Robert | Gosden, J H M | 98 | 29 | 30% | 64 | 65% | -19 |
| Doyle, James | Haggas, W J | 28 | 8 | 29% | 22 | 79% | -1 |
| Fanning, Joe | Johnston, M | 121 | 34 | 28% | 54 | 45% | 58 |
| Marquand, Tom | Hedger, P R | 22 | 6 | 27% | 8 | 36% | 20 |
| Keenan, Darragh | Evans, P D | 22 | 6 | 27% | 10 | 45% | 20 |
| Marquand, Tom | Haggas, W J | 34 | 9 | 26% | 20 | 59% | 5 |
| Tudhope, Daniel | OMeara, D | 23 | 6 | 26% | 11 | 48% | 5 |
| Hart, Jason | Quinn, J J | 20 | 5 | 25% | 9 | 45% | 3 |
| Mitchell, Jack | Palmer, Hugo | 20 | 5 | 25% | 8 | 40% | 8 |
| Marquand, Tom | Hannon (Jnr), Richard | 69 | 17 | 25% | 25 | 36% | 33 |
| Kingscote, Richard | Beckett, R M | 25 | 6 | 24% | 12 | 48% | 7 |
| Crowley, Jim | Perrett,s A J | 21 | 5 | 24% | 12 | 57% | -4 |
| Muscutt, D | Fanshawe, J R | 43 | 10 | 23% | 19 | 44% | 4 |
| Kingscote, Richard | Dascombe, Tom | 57 | 13 | 23% | 22 | 39% | -16 |
| Bryan, Joshua | Balding, A M | 22 | 5 | 23% | 10 | 45% | -7 |
| Spencer, Jamie | Simcock, D M | 40 | 9 | 23% | 21 | 53% | 11 |
| Keniry, L P | Butler, John | 27 | 6 | 22% | 10 | 37% | 12 |
| Shoemark, Kieran | Hills, Charles | 27 | 6 | 22% | 8 | 30% | 4 |
| Mitchell, Jack | Varian, Roger | 41 | 9 | 22% | 23 | 56% | -12 |
| Haynes, Joey | Perrett,s A J | 23 | 5 | 22% | 10 | 43% | 8 |
| Bishop, Charles | Channon, M R | 37 | 8 | 22% | 16 | 43% | 3 |
| Winston, Robert | Ivory, D K | 37 | 8 | 22% | 14 | 38% | 10 |
| Rawlinson, Ali | Appleby, M | 54 | 11 | 20% | 21 | 39% | 19 |
| Shoemark, Kieran | Charlton, R | 25 | 5 | 20% | 11 | 44% | -1 |
| Egan, John | Phelan, P M | 20 | 4 | 20% | 8 | 40% | 2 |
| Doyle, Hollie | Hannon (Jnr), Richard | 25 | 5 | 20% | 10 | 40% | 6 |
| Mackay, Nicky | Dow, S | 25 | 5 | 20% | 10 | 40% | 5 |
| Kirby, Adam | OMeara, D | 50 | 10 | 20% | 26 | 52% | 7 |
| Kirby, Adam | Dow, S | 26 | 5 | 19% | 12 | 46% | -10 |
| Berry, F M | Evans, P D | 26 | 5 | 19% | 9 | 35% | -1 |
| Clutterbuck, Rhys | Attwater, M J | 21 | 4 | 19% | 7 | 33% | 18 |
| Jamin, Pierre-Louis | Watson, Archie | 21 | 4 | 19% | 7 | 33% | 4 |
| Morris, Luke | Dow, S | 55 | 10 | 18% | 23 | 42% | 10 |
| Morris, Luke | Watson, Archie | 45 | 8 | 18% | 18 | 40% | 3 |
| ONeill, K T | Gosden, J H M | 23 | 4 | 17% | 11 | 48% | -9 |
| Kingscote, Richard | Williams, S C | 23 | 4 | 17% | 10 | 43% | 3 |
| Murphy, Oisin | Balding, A M | 29 | 5 | 17% | 12 | 41% | -12 |
| Doyle, Hollie | Stone, W B | 42 | 7 | 17% | 20 | 48% | 6 |
| Kirby, Adam | Butler, John | 30 | 5 | 17% | 10 | 33% | 1 |
| Norton, Francis | Johnston, M | 72 | 12 | 17% | 28 | 39% | -27 |
| Keenan, Darragh | Ryan, J | 30 | 5 | 17% | 13 | 43% | 5 |
| Levey, S M | Hannon (Jnr), Richard | 103 | 17 | 17% | 38 | 37% | 13 |
| Probert, David | Balding, A M | 61 | 10 | 16% | 20 | 33% | 1 |
| Probert, David | Carroll, A W | 37 | 6 | 16% | 16 | 43% | -5 |
| Bradley, Paddy | Phelan, P M | 56 | 9 | 16% | 17 | 30% | -3 |
| Ryan, Rossa | Hannon (Jnr), Richard | 51 | 8 | 16% | 20 | 39% | 11 |
| Mackay, Nicky | Gosden, J H M | 32 | 5 | 16% | 12 | 38% | 13 |
| Morris, Luke | Dunlop, H J L | 32 | 5 | 16% | 12 | 38% | 46 |
| Probert, David | OMeara, D | 20 | 3 | 15% | 5 | 25% | 4 |
| Greatrex, Edward | Houghton, Eve Johnson | 20 | 3 | 15% | 5 | 25% | -4 |
| Kelly, Shane | Baker, George | 20 | 3 | 15% | 8 | 40% | -2 |
| Hornby, Rob | Portman, J G | 41 | 6 | 15% | 9 | 22% | 32 |
| Egan, John | Evans, P D | 41 | 6 | 15% | 14 | 34% | -12 |
| Morris, Luke | Cowell, R M H | 21 | 3 | 14% | 8 | 38% | -5 |
| Probert, David | Blanshard, M | 36 | 5 | 14% | 11 | 31% | 2 |
| Queally, T P | Moore, G L | 29 | 4 | 14% | 7 | 24% | -9 |
| Harley, M | OMeara, D | 29 | 4 | 14% | 12 | 41% | -10 |
| Haynes, Joey | Banham, Chelsea | 51 | 7 | 14% | 17 | 33% | 10 |
| McHugh, B | Fahey, R A | 22 | 3 | 14% | 4 | 18% | -11 |
| Francis, Isobel | Usher, M D I | 22 | 3 | 14% | 4 | 18% | 2 |
| Dwyer, Martin | Muir, W R | 44 | 6 | 14% | 20 | 45% | 64 |
| Shepherd, Callum | Knight, W J | 22 | 3 | 14% | 8 | 36% | -1 |
| Carson, William | Wallis, Charlie | 37 | 5 | 14% | 14 | 38% | -6 |
| Marquand, Tom | Dow, S | 30 | 4 | 13% | 13 | 43% | -13 |
| Carson, William | Attwater, M J | 30 | 4 | 13% | 10 | 33% | -4 |
| Kirby, Adam | Cox, C G | 76 | 10 | 13% | 27 | 36% | -30 |
| Elliott, Jane | Margarson, G G | 23 | 3 | 13% | 8 | 35% | -6 |
| Morris, Luke | Prescott, Sir Mark | 85 | 11 | 13% | 29 | 34% | -49 |
| Clutterbuck, Rhys | Moore, G L | 32 | 4 | 13% | 13 | 41% | -8 |
| Morris, Luke | Walker, Ed | 33 | 4 | 12% | 13 | 39% | -12 |
| Harley, M | King, A | 34 | 4 | 12% | 15 | 44% | -10 |
| Costello, Dougie | Osborne, J A | 60 | 7 | 12% | 20 | 33% | -25 |
| Kelly, Shane | Hughes, Richard | 147 | 17 | 12% | 53 | 36% | -55 |
| Gordon, Josephine | Palmer, Hugo | 26 | 3 | 12% | 10 | 38% | -12 |
| Hansen, Thore | Hannon (Jnr), Richard | 36 | 4 | 11% | 17 | 47% | -20 |
| Hanagan, Paul | Fahey, R A | 27 | 3 | 11% | 12 | 44% | -8 |
| Downing, George | Ivory, D K | 27 | 3 | 11% | 6 | 22% | 53 |
| Dobie, Georgia | Houghton, Eve Johnson | 36 | 4 | 11% | 11 | 31% | -6 |
| Crouch, Hector | Moore, G L | 109 | 12 | 11% | 35 | 32% | -25 |
| Bishop, Charles | Houghton, Eve Johnson | 65 | 7 | 11% | 25 | 38% | -14 |
| Carson, William | Johnson, B R | 28 | 3 | 11% | 7 | 25% | -3 |
| Kelly, Shane | Elsworth, D R C | 28 | 3 | 11% | 9 | 32% | -7 |
| Downing, George | Carroll, A W | 38 | 4 | 11% | 13 | 34% | -12 |
| Donohoe, Stephen | Fellowes, Charlie | 57 | 6 | 11% | 18 | 32% | -27 |
| Wood, George | Fanshawe, J R | 29 | 3 | 10% | 11 | 38% | -12 |
| Hornby, Rob | Balding, A M | 29 | 3 | 10% | 7 | 24% | -23 |
| Shepherd, Callum | Dow, S | 30 | 3 | 10% | 8 | 27% | -14 |
| Bennett, Charlie | Harris, S A | 20 | 2 | 10% | 7 | 35% | -10 |
| Morris, Luke | Mongan,s L J | 20 | 2 | 10% | 7 | 35% | -6 |
| Brown, Thomas | Walker, Ed | 20 | 2 | 10% | 6 | 30% | 0 |
| Greatrex, Edward | Watson, Archie | 61 | 6 | 10% | 25 | 41% | -34 |
| Havlin, Robert | Crisford, Simon | 21 | 2 | 10% | 9 | 43% | -13 |
| Godwin, Mitch | Bridger, J J | 21 | 2 | 10% | 2 | 10% | -7 |
| Currie, Nicola | McEntee, P S | 32 | 3 | 9% | 7 | 22% | -15 |
To qualify a sires progeny needs to have run a minimum of 20 races at Lingfield (AW) in the last 5 years.
Top 100 Stallions
| B | W | W% | P | P% | P/L | |
| Adaay (IRE) | 29 | 8 | 28% | 12 | 41% | 9 |
| Redoutes Choice (AUS) | 22 | 6 | 27% | 11 | 50% | 2 |
| Kingman | 68 | 18 | 26% | 29 | 43% | 15 |
| Bobbys Kitten (USA) | 20 | 5 | 25% | 8 | 40% | 13 |
| Areion (GER) | 26 | 6 | 23% | 14 | 54% | 18 |
| Belardo (IRE) | 22 | 5 | 23% | 7 | 32% | 33 |
| Red Clubs (IRE) | 22 | 5 | 23% | 7 | 32% | 11 |
| Cape Cross (IRE) | 193 | 43 | 22% | 73 | 38% | 35 |
| Refuse To Bend (IRE) | 27 | 6 | 22% | 9 | 33% | 6 |
| Farhh | 28 | 6 | 21% | 12 | 43% | 8 |
| Dansili | 171 | 36 | 21% | 71 | 42% | -1 |
| Frankel | 81 | 17 | 21% | 31 | 38% | 6 |
| Golden Horn | 39 | 8 | 21% | 16 | 41% | 0 |
| Toronado (IRE) | 98 | 20 | 20% | 33 | 34% | 19 |
| Mehmas (IRE) | 35 | 7 | 20% | 17 | 49% | -1 |
| Dabirsim (FR) | 20 | 4 | 20% | 11 | 55% | 7 |
| Cape Blanco (IRE) | 20 | 4 | 20% | 8 | 40% | -5 |
| Makfi | 91 | 18 | 20% | 32 | 35% | 5 |
| Pivotal | 140 | 27 | 19% | 54 | 39% | -25 |
| Shamardal (USA) | 140 | 26 | 19% | 61 | 44% | -19 |
| Nayef (USA) | 27 | 5 | 19% | 8 | 30% | 1 |
| Sea The Stars (IRE) | 114 | 21 | 18% | 52 | 46% | -20 |
| War Front (USA) | 60 | 11 | 18% | 22 | 37% | -13 |
| Thewayyouare (USA) | 57 | 10 | 18% | 18 | 32% | 8 |
| Proclamation (IRE) | 23 | 4 | 17% | 8 | 35% | 20 |
| Arcano (IRE) | 133 | 23 | 17% | 49 | 37% | 3 |
| Baltic King | 35 | 6 | 17% | 11 | 31% | 38 |
| Free Eagle (IRE) | 35 | 6 | 17% | 8 | 23% | -15 |
| Archipenko (USA) | 123 | 21 | 17% | 38 | 31% | 26 |
| Speightstown (USA) | 41 | 7 | 17% | 13 | 32% | -7 |
| Duke Of Marmalade (IRE) | 30 | 5 | 17% | 12 | 40% | 24 |
| First Defence (USA) | 24 | 4 | 17% | 4 | 17% | -3 |
| Lope De Vega (IRE) | 128 | 21 | 16% | 48 | 38% | -28 |
| Sea The Moon (GER) | 38 | 6 | 16% | 11 | 29% | -5 |
| Henrythenavigator (USA) | 70 | 11 | 16% | 23 | 33% | 7 |
| Dawn Approach (IRE) | 77 | 12 | 16% | 29 | 38% | -31 |
| Dark Angel (IRE) | 355 | 55 | 15% | 131 | 37% | -24 |
| Tagula (IRE) | 26 | 4 | 15% | 7 | 27% | -2 |
| Major Cadeaux | 26 | 4 | 15% | 11 | 42% | 45 |
| Dubawi (IRE) | 137 | 21 | 15% | 52 | 38% | -54 |
| Iffraaj | 183 | 28 | 15% | 56 | 31% | 11 |
| Ravens Pass (USA) | 93 | 14 | 15% | 31 | 33% | -39 |
| Le Havre (IRE) | 40 | 6 | 15% | 11 | 28% | -14 |
| Kyllachy | 247 | 37 | 15% | 89 | 36% | -46 |
| Mawatheeq (USA) | 27 | 4 | 15% | 10 | 37% | -2 |
| Outstrip | 54 | 8 | 15% | 20 | 37% | -12 |
| Ivawood (IRE) | 34 | 5 | 15% | 12 | 35% | 3 |
| Sayif (IRE) | 34 | 5 | 15% | 10 | 29% | -3 |
| Sepoy (AUS) | 164 | 24 | 15% | 57 | 35% | 17 |
| Bertolini (USA) | 55 | 8 | 15% | 19 | 35% | 19 |
| Charm Spirit (IRE) | 70 | 10 | 14% | 24 | 34% | -22 |
| Zamindar (USA) | 35 | 5 | 14% | 10 | 29% | -0 |
| Make Believe | 28 | 4 | 14% | 9 | 32% | -14 |
| Aussie Rules (USA) | 56 | 8 | 14% | 13 | 23% | 29 |
| Exceed And Excel (AUS) | 345 | 49 | 14% | 127 | 37% | -38 |
| Delegator | 127 | 18 | 14% | 43 | 34% | 60 |
| Monsieur Bond (IRE) | 100 | 14 | 14% | 34 | 34% | 6 |
| Australia | 50 | 7 | 14% | 15 | 30% | -35 |
| Kittens Joy (USA) | 43 | 6 | 14% | 17 | 40% | -5 |
| Canford Cliffs (IRE) | 115 | 16 | 14% | 37 | 32% | 6 |
| Hot Streak (IRE) | 29 | 4 | 14% | 8 | 28% | 6 |
| Azamour (IRE) | 29 | 4 | 14% | 9 | 31% | -12 |
| Fastnet Rock (AUS) | 51 | 7 | 14% | 17 | 33% | -12 |
| Due Diligence (USA) | 44 | 6 | 14% | 17 | 39% | 22 |
| Footstepsinthesand | 140 | 19 | 14% | 43 | 31% | -41 |
| Zebedee | 234 | 31 | 13% | 75 | 32% | -29 |
| Gleneagles (IRE) | 53 | 7 | 13% | 21 | 40% | -30 |
| New Approach (IRE) | 106 | 14 | 13% | 39 | 37% | -26 |
| Sakhees Secret | 106 | 14 | 13% | 28 | 26% | -2 |
| Authorized (IRE) | 53 | 7 | 13% | 15 | 28% | 22 |
| Dream Ahead (USA) | 99 | 13 | 13% | 29 | 29% | -0 |
| Invincible Spirit (IRE) | 227 | 29 | 13% | 85 | 37% | -38 |
| Havana Gold (IRE) | 110 | 14 | 13% | 36 | 33% | -23 |
| Gale Force Ten | 24 | 3 | 13% | 10 | 42% | -5 |
| Excelebration (IRE) | 72 | 9 | 13% | 25 | 35% | -14 |
| Dutch Art | 185 | 23 | 12% | 65 | 35% | -69 |
| Oasis Dream | 242 | 30 | 12% | 78 | 32% | -91 |
| Muhaarar | 65 | 8 | 12% | 17 | 26% | -22 |
| Champs Elysees | 155 | 19 | 12% | 41 | 26% | -27 |
| Art Connoisseur (IRE) | 33 | 4 | 12% | 8 | 24% | -15 |
| Famous Name | 33 | 4 | 12% | 11 | 33% | -5 |
| Kodiac | 484 | 58 | 12% | 160 | 33% | -103 |
| Siyouni (FR) | 67 | 8 | 12% | 25 | 37% | -28 |
| Lethal Force (IRE) | 153 | 18 | 12% | 41 | 27% | -9 |
| Cable Bay (IRE) | 68 | 8 | 12% | 18 | 26% | -24 |
| Intello (GER) | 34 | 4 | 12% | 10 | 29% | -11 |
| Foxwedge (AUS) | 112 | 13 | 12% | 32 | 29% | -14 |
| Lawman (FR) | 138 | 16 | 12% | 49 | 36% | -22 |
| So You Think (NZ) | 26 | 3 | 12% | 7 | 27% | -8 |
| Helmet (AUS) | 157 | 18 | 11% | 57 | 36% | -51 |
| Teofilo (IRE) | 140 | 16 | 11% | 45 | 32% | -80 |
| Pour Moi (IRE) | 44 | 5 | 11% | 11 | 25% | -16 |
| Showcasing | 203 | 23 | 11% | 64 | 32% | -73 |
| Kendargent (FR) | 62 | 7 | 11% | 19 | 31% | -22 |
| Street Cry (IRE) | 62 | 7 | 11% | 20 | 32% | -0 |
| Elnadim (USA) | 27 | 3 | 11% | 9 | 33% | -18 |
| Sleeping Indian | 36 | 4 | 11% | 8 | 22% | 15 |
| Lilbourne Lad (IRE) | 81 | 9 | 11% | 24 | 30% | -36 |
| Medicean | 117 | 13 | 11% | 30 | 26% | 13 |
| Camacho | 173 | 19 | 11% | 52 | 30% | -35 |
© 2021, One Stop Racing. All rights reserved.