Kempton Park racecourse statistics for the all-weather flat course.
The statisticians here at One Stop Racing have compiled a wealth of data for the All-Weather course at Kempton Park.
Scroll down and you will discover Kempton Favourite Statistics, Kempton Draw Analysis, Kempton leading Jockey, Trainer and Sire data.
Kempton Favourite Statistics
All these statistics were independently collected by us over the last 5 years.
| Bets | Wins | P/L(SP) | Win% | Place | Place% | |
| All Favs | 2441 | 806 | -180 | 33% | 1524 | 62% |
| Outright Favs | 2131 | 741 | -128 | 35% | 1361 | 64% |
| Joint Favs | 270 | 59 | -39 | 22% | 142 | 53% |
| Co Favs | 40 | 6 | -13 | 15% | 21 | 53% |
| 2nd Favs | 2359 | 469 | -208 | 20% | 1198 | 51% |
Kempton All-Weather draw analysis
All these statistics were independently collected by us from 1st January 2011 to the present day.
To qualify for our analysis races must have a minimum of 8 runners.
We have tracked which stall the winner and placed horses came from in every qualifying race, we only collect data on 3 places despite the size of the field or any bookmakers offering extra places in a specific races.
In the case of 2 horses dead heating for 1st place both are counted as winners.
For the number of wins and places that each stall has, wins are included as places, so if a stall has 2 wins and 4 places, that stall has technically placed 6 times, when we calculate the place percentage of a certain stall we will include wins in those statistics. All percentages have been calculated on how many times that stall has been used.
5f
6f
7f
1m
1m 2f
1m 3f
1m 4f
2m
Kempton 5 furlong draw analysis.
We tracked 148 races, in total there were 1406 runners.
| Bets | Wins | Win% | P/L(SP) | Places | Place% | Races |
| 1406 | 148 | 10.53 | -363.6 | 444 | 31.58 | 148 |
Draw data broken down by stall
This illustrates the Kempton draw bias for 5 furlongs
| Stall | Bets | Wins | Win% | P/L(SP) | Places | Place% | Races |
| 1 | 141 | 26 | 18.44 | 28.84 | 65 | 46.1 | 141 |
| 2 | 145 | 15 | 10.34 | -32.69 | 46 | 31.72 | 145 |
| 3 | 139 | 14 | 10.07 | -46.29 | 45 | 32.37 | 139 |
| 4 | 143 | 12 | 8.39 | -64.67 | 46 | 32.17 | 143 |
| 5 | 142 | 16 | 11.27 | -41.25 | 51 | 35.92 | 142 |
| 6 | 141 | 18 | 12.77 | -14.67 | 52 | 36.88 | 141 |
| 7 | 142 | 11 | 7.75 | -55.25 | 38 | 26.76 | 142 |
| 8 | 139 | 17 | 12.23 | -39.82 | 43 | 30.94 | 139 |
| 9 | 128 | 13 | 10.16 | -19.8 | 34 | 26.56 | 128 |
| 10 | 89 | 4 | 4.49 | -48 | 15 | 16.85 | 89 |
| 11 | 32 | 0 | 0 | -32 | 5 | 15.63 | 32 |
| 12 | 25 | 2 | 8 | 2 | 4 | 16 | 25 |
Running style analysis
Analysis of running style using last 200 races in Kempton races at distance of 5furlongs.
| Running Style | Runners | Wins | Strike Rate | P/L (SP) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Front Runner | 267 | 84 | 31.46% | 212.31 |
| Prominent | 471 | 65 | 13.8% | -89.84 |
| Tracked/Chased | 157 | 15 | 9.55% | -53.05 |
| Mid Division | 113 | 7 | 6.19% | -57.17 |
| Held Up | 518 | 25 | 4.83% | -332.46 |
| Poor Start | 90 | 2 | 2.22% | -81.75 |
Kempton 6 furlong draw analysis.
We tracked 852 races, in total there were 8672 runners.
| Bets | Wins | Win% | P/L(SP) | Places | Place% | Races |
| 8672 | 855 | 9.86 | -2533.47 | 2561 | 29.53 | 852 |
Draw data broken down by stall
This illustrates the Kempton draw bias for 6 furlongs
| Stall | Bets | Wins | Win% | P/L(SP) | Places | Place% | Races |
| 1 | 828 | 100 | 12.08 | -197.22 | 292 | 35.27 | 828 |
| 2 | 800 | 104 | 13 | -102.82 | 287 | 35.88 | 800 |
| 3 | 810 | 97 | 11.98 | -174.99 | 289 | 35.68 | 810 |
| 4 | 803 | 89 | 11.08 | -177.69 | 294 | 36.61 | 803 |
| 5 | 811 | 77 | 9.49 | -362.75 | 259 | 31.94 | 811 |
| 6 | 802 | 96 | 11.97 | -182.47 | 252 | 31.42 | 802 |
| 7 | 810 | 71 | 8.77 | -342.94 | 206 | 25.43 | 810 |
| 8 | 804 | 64 | 7.96 | -254.65 | 195 | 24.25 | 804 |
| 9 | 740 | 60 | 8.11 | -321.75 | 180 | 24.32 | 740 |
| 10 | 601 | 36 | 5.99 | -177.75 | 135 | 22.46 | 601 |
| 11 | 491 | 36 | 7.33 | -100.74 | 99 | 20.16 | 491 |
| 12 | 372 | 25 | 6.72 | -137.7 | 73 | 19.62 | 372 |
Running style analysis
Analysis of running style using last 200 races in Kempton races at distance of 6 furlongs
| Running Style | Runners | Wins | Strike Rate | P/L (SP) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Front Runner | 266 | 47 | 17.67% | 12.97 |
| Prominent | 423 | 59 | 13.95% | 43.84 |
| Tracked/Chased | 229 | 20 | 8.73% | -93.77 |
| Mid Division | 268 | 18 | 6.72% | -132.14 |
| Held Up | 631 | 51 | 8.08% | -165.32 |
| Poor Start | 65 | 5 | 7.69% | -37.64 |
Kempton 7 furlong draw analysis.
We tracked 1036 races, in total there were 11570 runners.
| Bets | Wins | Win% | P/L(SP) | Places | Place% | Races |
| 11570 | 1040 | 8.99 | -3380.67 | 3117 | 26.94 | 1036 |
Draw data broken down by stall
This illustrates the Kempton draw bias for 7 furlongs
| Stall | Bets | Wins | Win% | P/L(SP) | Places | Place% | Races |
| 1 | 986 | 113 | 11.46 | -195.72 | 319 | 32.35 | 986 |
| 2 | 991 | 117 | 11.81 | -63.08 | 312 | 31.48 | 991 |
| 3 | 983 | 93 | 9.46 | -368.67 | 305 | 31.03 | 983 |
| 4 | 991 | 128 | 12.92 | -92.15 | 306 | 30.88 | 991 |
| 5 | 988 | 90 | 9.11 | -262.99 | 290 | 29.35 | 988 |
| 6 | 995 | 94 | 9.45 | -279.43 | 285 | 28.64 | 995 |
| 7 | 983 | 79 | 8.04 | -245.31 | 242 | 24.62 | 983 |
| 8 | 968 | 89 | 9.19 | -295.25 | 260 | 26.86 | 968 |
| 9 | 922 | 82 | 8.89 | -222.14 | 233 | 25.27 | 922 |
| 10 | 794 | 40 | 5.04 | -484.8 | 181 | 22.8 | 794 |
| 11 | 668 | 50 | 7.49 | -223.71 | 145 | 21.71 | 668 |
| 12 | 540 | 30 | 5.56 | -185.79 | 115 | 21.3 | 540 |
| 13 | 435 | 19 | 4.37 | -281.13 | 69 | 15.86 | 435 |
| 14 | 325 | 16 | 4.92 | -179.5 | 55 | 16.92 | 325 |
| 15 | 1 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Running style analysis
Analysis of running style using last 200 races in Kempton races at distance of 7 furlongs
| Running style | Runners | Wins | Strike Rate | P/L (SP) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Front Runner | 271 | 62 | 22.88% | 200.08 |
| Prominent | 415 | 52 | 12.53% | -73.90 |
| Tracked/Chased | 275 | 21 | 7.64% | -50.52 |
| Mid Division | 284 | 18 | 6.34% | -115.99 |
| Held Up | 780 | 46 | 5.9% | -409.36 |
| Poor Start | 74 | 1 | 1.35% | -67.50 |
Kempton 1 mile draw analysis.
We tracked 1171 races, in total there were 13365 runners.
| Bets | Wins | Win% | P/L(SP) | Places | Place% | Races |
| 13365 | 1173 | 8.78 | -3771.31 | 3523 | 26.36 | 1171 |
Draw data broken down by stall
This illustrates the Kempton draw bias for 1 mile.
| Stall | Bets | Wins | Win% | P/L(SP) | Places | Place% | Races |
| 1 | 1114 | 88 | 7.9 | -599.52 | 305 | 27.38 | 1114 |
| 2 | 1109 | 105 | 9.47 | -410.71 | 344 | 31.02 | 1109 |
| 3 | 1126 | 100 | 8.88 | -446.28 | 335 | 29.75 | 1126 |
| 4 | 1119 | 107 | 9.56 | -261.38 | 312 | 27.88 | 1119 |
| 5 | 1115 | 124 | 11.12 | -100.01 | 311 | 27.89 | 1115 |
| 6 | 1118 | 109 | 9.75 | -185.13 | 325 | 29.07 | 1118 |
| 7 | 1118 | 115 | 10.29 | -150.08 | 313 | 28 | 1118 |
| 8 | 1113 | 106 | 9.52 | -317.61 | 301 | 27.04 | 1113 |
| 9 | 1045 | 83 | 7.94 | -314.07 | 263 | 25.17 | 1045 |
| 10 | 942 | 60 | 6.37 | -377.81 | 215 | 22.82 | 942 |
| 11 | 819 | 71 | 8.67 | -87.68 | 182 | 22.22 | 819 |
| 12 | 666 | 49 | 7.36 | -203.83 | 146 | 21.92 | 666 |
| 13 | 537 | 24 | 4.47 | -275.15 | 87 | 16.2 | 537 |
| 14 | 409 | 30 | 7.34 | -82.05 | 80 | 19.56 | 409 |
| 15 | 8 | 0 | 0 | -8 | 2 | 25 | 8 |
| 16 | 7 | 2 | 28.57 | 48 | 2 | 28.57 | 7 |
Running style analysis
Analysis of running style using last 200 races in Kempton races at distance of 1 mile
| Running Stlye | Runners | Wins | Strike Rate | P/L (SP) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Front Runner | 300 | 47 | 15.67% | 14.90 |
| Prominent | 422 | 58 | 13.74% | -84.47 |
| Tracked/Chased | 277 | 25 | 9.03% | -104.60 |
| Mid Division | 288 | 16 | 5.56% | -147.42 |
| Held Up | 759 | 53 | 6.98% | -358.03 |
| Poor Start | 87 | 1 | 1.15% | -78.00 |
Kempton 1 mile 2 furlongs draw analysis.
We tracked 186 races, in total there were 2045 runners.
| Bets | Wins | Win% | P/L(SP) | Places | Place% | Races |
| 2045 | 187 | 9.14 | -553.11 | 560 | 27.38 | 186 |
Draw data broken down by stall
This illustrates the Kempton draw bias for 1 mile 2 furlongs.
| Stall | Bets | Wins | Win% | P/L(SP) | Places | Place% | Races |
| 1 | 177 | 14 | 7.91 | -87.87 | 48 | 27.12 | 177 |
| 2 | 177 | 13 | 7.34 | -68.42 | 63 | 35.59 | 177 |
| 3 | 174 | 20 | 11.49 | -44.82 | 51 | 29.31 | 174 |
| 4 | 181 | 22 | 12.15 | 5.76 | 58 | 32.04 | 181 |
| 5 | 169 | 13 | 7.69 | -89.29 | 41 | 24.26 | 169 |
| 6 | 176 | 17 | 9.66 | -96.99 | 56 | 31.82 | 176 |
| 7 | 176 | 14 | 7.95 | -79.87 | 49 | 27.84 | 176 |
| 8 | 180 | 13 | 7.22 | -47.25 | 49 | 27.22 | 180 |
| 9 | 160 | 23 | 14.38 | 34.25 | 46 | 28.75 | 160 |
| 10 | 140 | 8 | 5.71 | -39 | 32 | 22.86 | 140 |
| 11 | 113 | 14 | 12.39 | 26.4 | 25 | 22.12 | 113 |
| 12 | 97 | 11 | 11.34 | -2.26 | 21 | 21.65 | 97 |
| 13 | 71 | 4 | 5.63 | -18.75 | 15 | 21.13 | 71 |
| 14 | 54 | 1 | 1.85 | -45 | 6 | 11.11 | 54 |
Running style analysis
Analysis of running style using last 200 races in Kempton races at distance of 1 mile 2 furlongs
| Running Style | Runners | Wins | Strike Rate | P/L (SP) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Front Runner | 248 | 33 | 13.31% | -43.38 |
| Prominent | 466 | 64 | 13.73% | 10.29 |
| Tracked/Chased | 205 | 24 | 11.71% | -41.71 |
| Mid Division | 164 | 10 | 6.1% | -52.25 |
| Held Up | 791 | 62 | 7.84% | -335.14 |
| Poor Start | 42 | 2 | 4.76% | -23.00 |
Kempton 1 mile 3 furlongs draw analysis.
We tracked 341 races, in total there were 3744 runners.
| Bets | Wins | Win% | P/L(SP) | Places | Place% | Races |
| 3744 | 342 | 9.13 | -1032.17 | 1028 | 27.46 | 341 |
Draw data broken down by stall
This illustrates the Kempton draw bias for 1 mile 3 furlongs.
| Stall | Bets | Wins | Win% | P/L(SP) | Places | Place% | Races |
| 1 | 324 | 36 | 11.11 | -55.36 | 89 | 27.47 | 324 |
| 2 | 331 | 31 | 9.37 | -28.62 | 103 | 31.12 | 331 |
| 3 | 335 | 38 | 11.34 | -51.95 | 118 | 35.22 | 335 |
| 4 | 335 | 27 | 8.06 | -147.04 | 94 | 28.06 | 335 |
| 5 | 320 | 32 | 10 | -94.17 | 93 | 29.06 | 320 |
| 6 | 318 | 34 | 10.69 | -5.83 | 92 | 28.93 | 318 |
| 7 | 322 | 29 | 9.01 | -79.25 | 90 | 27.95 | 322 |
| 8 | 319 | 26 | 8.15 | -133.19 | 91 | 28.53 | 319 |
| 9 | 297 | 29 | 9.76 | -70.94 | 78 | 26.26 | 297 |
| 10 | 251 | 22 | 8.76 | -120.8 | 68 | 27.09 | 251 |
| 11 | 206 | 15 | 7.28 | -97.77 | 43 | 20.87 | 206 |
| 12 | 156 | 13 | 8.33 | -39.25 | 38 | 24.36 | 156 |
| 13 | 121 | 2 | 1.65 | -82 | 13 | 10.74 | 121 |
| 14 | 97 | 6 | 6.19 | -40 | 15 | 15.46 | 97 |
| 15 | 7 | 2 | 28.57 | 19 | 2 | 28.57 | 7 |
| 16 | 5 | 0 | 0 | -5 | 1 | 20 | 5 |
Running style analysis
Analysis of running style using last 200 races in Kempton races at distance of 1 mile 3 furlongs
| Running Style | Runners | Wins | Strike Rate | P/L (SP) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Front Runner | 296 | 43 | 14.53% | -27.26 |
| Prominent | 481 | 64 | 13.31% | -30.50 |
| Tracked/Chased | 215 | 16 | 7.44% | -99.85 |
| Mid Division | 263 | 21 | 7.98% | -34.55 |
| Held Up | 792 | 56 | 7.07% | -271.30 |
| Poor Start | 63 | 1 | 1.59% | -61.75 |
Kempton 1 mile 4 furlongs draw analysis.
We tracked 473 races, in total there were 5139 runners.
| Bets | Wins | Win% | P/L(SP) | Places | Place% | Races |
| 5139 | 473 | 9.2 | -1530.63 | 1419 | 27.61 | 473 |
Draw data broken down by stall
This illustrates the Kempton draw bias for 1 mile 4 furlongs.
| Stall | Bets | Wins | Win% | P/L(SP) | Places | Place% | Races |
| 1 | 453 | 43 | 9.49 | -92.06 | 128 | 28.26 | 453 |
| 2 | 455 | 47 | 10.33 | -45.52 | 121 | 26.59 | 455 |
| 3 | 453 | 36 | 7.95 | -226.13 | 149 | 32.89 | 453 |
| 4 | 456 | 41 | 8.99 | -120 | 122 | 26.75 | 456 |
| 5 | 449 | 47 | 10.47 | -57.75 | 140 | 31.18 | 449 |
| 6 | 451 | 55 | 12.2 | -98.98 | 127 | 28.16 | 451 |
| 7 | 446 | 47 | 10.54 | -166.81 | 134 | 30.04 | 446 |
| 8 | 445 | 41 | 9.21 | -209.02 | 126 | 28.31 | 445 |
| 9 | 392 | 30 | 7.65 | -183.65 | 107 | 27.3 | 392 |
| 10 | 346 | 22 | 6.36 | -185.05 | 81 | 23.41 | 346 |
| 11 | 279 | 22 | 7.89 | -42.17 | 74 | 26.52 | 279 |
| 12 | 215 | 23 | 10.7 | -12.74 | 56 | 26.05 | 215 |
| 13 | 165 | 9 | 5.45 | -74.5 | 32 | 19.39 | 165 |
| 14 | 134 | 10 | 7.46 | -16.25 | 22 | 16.42 | 134 |
Running style analysis
Analysis of running style using last 200 races in Kempton races at distance of 1 mile 4 furlongs
| Running Style | Runners | Wins | Strike Rate | P/L (SP) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Front Runner | 280 | 42 | 15% | -6.36 |
| Prominent | 451 | 60 | 13.3% | -148.40 |
| Tracked/Chased | 250 | 24 | 9.6% | -133.02 |
| Mid Division | 247 | 16 | 6.48% | -142.51 |
| Held Up | 727 | 53 | 7.29% | -328.24 |
| Poor Start | 60 | 5 | 8.33% | -33.34 |
Kempton 2 miles draw analysis.
We tracked 222 races, in total there were 2345 runners.
| Bets | Wins | Win% | P/L(SP) | Places | Place% | Races |
| 2345 | 222 | 9.47 | -400.96 | 668 | 28.49 | 222 |
Draw data broken down by stall
This illustrates the Kempton draw bias for 2 miles.
| Draw | Bets | Wins | Win% | P/L(SP) | Places | Place% | Races |
| 1 | 212 | 26 | 12.26 | -4.42 | 64 | 30.19 | 212 |
| 2 | 216 | 18 | 8.33 | -68.17 | 64 | 29.63 | 216 |
| 3 | 211 | 28 | 13.27 | -71.62 | 70 | 33.18 | 211 |
| 4 | 207 | 29 | 14.01 | 27.85 | 74 | 35.75 | 207 |
| 5 | 215 | 26 | 12.09 | -3.37 | 67 | 31.16 | 215 |
| 6 | 216 | 14 | 6.48 | -157.16 | 58 | 26.85 | 216 |
| 7 | 212 | 17 | 8.02 | -41.08 | 63 | 29.72 | 212 |
| 8 | 213 | 17 | 7.98 | -51.74 | 60 | 28.17 | 213 |
| 9 | 188 | 18 | 9.57 | 61.75 | 57 | 30.32 | 188 |
| 10 | 153 | 9 | 5.88 | 2.5 | 34 | 22.22 | 153 |
| 11 | 118 | 12 | 10.17 | 12.5 | 29 | 24.58 | 118 |
| 12 | 83 | 3 | 3.61 | -57.5 | 8 | 9.64 | 83 |
| 13 | 56 | 3 | 5.36 | -27 | 10 | 17.86 | 56 |
| 14 | 45 | 2 | 4.44 | -23.5 | 10 | 22.22 | 45 |
Running style analysis
Analysis of running style using last 200 races in Kempton races at distance of 2 miles.
| Running Style | Runners | Wins | Strike Rate | P/L (SP) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Front Runner | 235 | 30 | 12.77% | 5.69 |
| Prominent | 491 | 53 | 10.79% | -118.56 |
| Tracked/Chased | 174 | 19 | 10.92% | -7.12 |
| Mid Division | 165 | 21 | 12.73% | 4.06 |
| Held Up | 754 | 76 | 10.08% | -125.79 |
| Poor Start | 38 | 1 | 2.63% | -25.00 |
Kempton (AW) Jockey, Trainer and Sire Data.
All these statistics were independently collected by us over the last 5 years. .
Key: B – Bets, W – Wins, W% – win percentage, P – Places, P% – place percentage, P/L – profit / loss (WIN ONLY) to a 1 point stake.
Jockeys
Trainers
Jockey / Trainer
Sires
To qualify a jockey has to have had a minimum of 20 rides at Kempton in the last 5 years.
Top 100 Jockeys
| B | W | W% | P | P% | P/L | |
| Dettori, L | 31 | 8 | 26% | 17 | 55% | -17 |
| Buick, William | 177 | 43 | 24% | 89 | 50% | -43 |
| Doyle, James | 308 | 71 | 23% | 140 | 45% | 36 |
| Atzeni, Andrea | 210 | 47 | 22% | 98 | 47% | 48 |
| Tudhope, Daniel | 36 | 8 | 22% | 15 | 42% | 7 |
| Moore, Ryan | 123 | 24 | 20% | 54 | 44% | -21 |
| Fanning, Joe | 158 | 30 | 19% | 58 | 37% | -11 |
| Crowley, Jim | 407 | 77 | 19% | 167 | 41% | -86 |
| Murphy, Oisin | 612 | 108 | 18% | 266 | 43% | -91 |
| Mosse, G | 80 | 13 | 16% | 28 | 35% | 9 |
| Havlin, Robert | 401 | 65 | 16% | 150 | 37% | -123 |
| Baker, George | 87 | 14 | 16% | 35 | 40% | -21 |
| Sousa, Silvestre De | 286 | 44 | 15% | 107 | 37% | -107 |
| Curtis, B A | 156 | 23 | 15% | 56 | 36% | -35 |
| Villiers, Angus | 34 | 5 | 15% | 16 | 47% | -4 |
| Spencer, Jamie | 185 | 26 | 14% | 65 | 35% | -59 |
| Bass, George | 29 | 4 | 14% | 8 | 28% | 24 |
| Mahon, Gary | 22 | 3 | 14% | 3 | 14% | -1 |
| Harley, M | 213 | 29 | 14% | 71 | 33% | -48 |
| Mackay, Nicky | 75 | 10 | 13% | 23 | 31% | -3 |
| Glass, Amelia | 30 | 4 | 13% | 9 | 30% | 11 |
| Noble, Cameron | 45 | 6 | 13% | 15 | 33% | -18 |
| McDonald, P J | 241 | 32 | 13% | 80 | 33% | 5 |
| Kingscote, Richard | 362 | 48 | 13% | 126 | 35% | -35 |
| Doyle, Hollie | 518 | 67 | 13% | 160 | 31% | -156 |
| Kirby, Adam | 654 | 84 | 13% | 241 | 37% | -197 |
| Cherchi, Stefano | 78 | 10 | 13% | 21 | 27% | -16 |
| Hart, Jason | 39 | 5 | 13% | 13 | 33% | -16 |
| Mitchell, Jack | 312 | 39 | 13% | 109 | 35% | -103 |
| Tylicki, Frederik | 24 | 3 | 13% | 6 | 25% | -8 |
| Greatrex, Edward | 201 | 25 | 12% | 59 | 29% | -14 |
| McNamara, Adam | 65 | 8 | 12% | 22 | 34% | -9 |
| Da Silva, Raul | 82 | 10 | 12% | 24 | 29% | 8 |
| Rawlinson, Ali | 108 | 13 | 12% | 33 | 31% | -19 |
| ONeill, Dane | 134 | 16 | 12% | 48 | 36% | -11 |
| Bentley, Harry | 243 | 29 | 12% | 79 | 33% | -47 |
| Egan, David | 222 | 26 | 12% | 64 | 29% | -51 |
| Dobbs, Pat | 103 | 12 | 12% | 31 | 30% | -36 |
| Cosgrave, Pat | 207 | 24 | 12% | 61 | 29% | -39 |
| Eaves, Tom | 26 | 3 | 12% | 7 | 27% | 46 |
| McHugh, B | 26 | 3 | 12% | 9 | 35% | -11 |
| Norton, Francis | 200 | 23 | 12% | 51 | 26% | -46 |
| Edmunds, Lewis | 45 | 5 | 11% | 11 | 24% | 3 |
| Monaghan, M M | 47 | 5 | 11% | 12 | 26% | -9 |
| Murphy, Timmy | 95 | 10 | 11% | 21 | 22% | -8 |
| Ryan, Rossa | 276 | 29 | 11% | 85 | 31% | -79 |
| Dwyer, Martin | 296 | 31 | 10% | 87 | 29% | -21 |
| Beschizza,Adam | 87 | 9 | 10% | 22 | 25% | -19 |
| Marquand, Tom | 708 | 73 | 10% | 225 | 32% | -72 |
| Currie, Nicola | 306 | 31 | 10% | 69 | 23% | 3 |
| Watson, Jason | 278 | 28 | 10% | 68 | 24% | -94 |
| Duern, J | 60 | 6 | 10% | 10 | 17% | 19 |
| Winston, Robert | 201 | 20 | 10% | 48 | 24% | -30 |
| Steward, Louis | 62 | 6 | 10% | 16 | 26% | -18 |
| Tate, Ryan | 166 | 16 | 10% | 46 | 28% | -34 |
| Probert, David | 724 | 69 | 10% | 198 | 27% | -158 |
| Naseb, Milly | 21 | 2 | 10% | 6 | 29% | -6 |
| Garritty, Jack | 21 | 2 | 10% | 9 | 43% | 7 |
| Shoemark, Kieran | 338 | 32 | 9% | 96 | 28% | -86 |
| Morris, Luke | 888 | 83 | 9% | 221 | 25% | -154 |
| Nicholls, Miss M | 44 | 4 | 9% | 9 | 20% | -9 |
| Berry, F M | 211 | 19 | 9% | 52 | 25% | -44 |
| Hornby, Rob | 393 | 35 | 9% | 98 | 25% | -81 |
| Pearson, Laura | 34 | 3 | 9% | 10 | 29% | -11 |
| Hanagan, Paul | 23 | 2 | 9% | 12 | 52% | -19 |
| Durcan, Ted | 58 | 5 | 9% | 17 | 29% | -30 |
| Muscutt, D | 338 | 29 | 9% | 101 | 30% | 14 |
| Clutterbuck, Rhys | 35 | 3 | 9% | 6 | 17% | -18 |
| Shepherd, Callum | 378 | 32 | 8% | 99 | 26% | -134 |
| Greatrex, Thomas | 72 | 6 | 8% | 17 | 24% | -35 |
| Fox, Kieren | 192 | 16 | 8% | 49 | 26% | -65 |
| Saunders, Tyler | 49 | 4 | 8% | 12 | 24% | -23 |
| Malune, Gabriele | 87 | 7 | 8% | 20 | 23% | -28 |
| Wood, George | 237 | 19 | 8% | 62 | 26% | -82 |
| Donohoe, Stephen | 282 | 22 | 8% | 74 | 26% | -105 |
| Gordon, Josephine | 351 | 27 | 8% | 87 | 25% | -118 |
| Catton, Luke | 26 | 2 | 8% | 5 | 19% | 2 |
| Queally, T P | 261 | 20 | 8% | 63 | 24% | -86 |
| Carver, William | 40 | 3 | 8% | 10 | 25% | -21 |
| Levey, S M | 326 | 24 | 7% | 98 | 30% | -107 |
| Hansen, Thore | 68 | 5 | 7% | 15 | 22% | -31 |
| Crouch, Hector | 344 | 25 | 7% | 90 | 26% | -167 |
| Fallon, Cieren | 125 | 9 | 7% | 33 | 26% | -9 |
| McEntee, Grace | 42 | 3 | 7% | 10 | 24% | -30 |
| Elliott, Jane | 85 | 6 | 7% | 20 | 24% | 2 |
| Beech, Aled J | 57 | 4 | 7% | 9 | 16% | -27 |
| Crehan, Mark | 43 | 3 | 7% | 8 | 19% | -29 |
| Egan, John | 217 | 15 | 7% | 45 | 21% | -51 |
| Godwin, Mitch | 88 | 6 | 7% | 19 | 22% | -8 |
| Clark, Tim | 45 | 3 | 7% | 6 | 13% | -18 |
| Rooke, George | 75 | 5 | 7% | 16 | 21% | 1 |
| Ghiani, Marco | 60 | 4 | 7% | 17 | 28% | -29 |
| Keniry, L P | 577 | 38 | 7% | 113 | 20% | -222 |
| Marsh, Finley | 62 | 4 | 6% | 21 | 34% | 8 |
| Francis, Isobel | 31 | 2 | 6% | 5 | 16% | 31 |
| Kelly, Shane | 517 | 31 | 6% | 129 | 25% | -198 |
| Parkes, D A | 34 | 2 | 6% | 9 | 26% | -22 |
| Keenan, Darragh | 119 | 7 | 6% | 22 | 18% | -39 |
| Dobie, Georgia | 51 | 3 | 6% | 13 | 25% | -36 |
| McCullagh, Scott | 51 | 3 | 6% | 11 | 22% | -24 |
To qualify a trainer has to have had a minimum of 20 runners at Kempton in the last 5 years.
Top 100 Trainers
| B | W | W% | P | P% | P/L | |
| Appleby, Charlie | 119 | 43 | 36% | 79 | 66% | -22 |
| Noseda, J | 47 | 16 | 34% | 29 | 62% | 2 |
| Foy, Kevin | 20 | 6 | 30% | 9 | 45% | 9 |
| Gosden, J H M | 361 | 94 | 26% | 181 | 50% | -32 |
| Rowe, R | 24 | 6 | 25% | 8 | 33% | 21 |
| Curran, S | 26 | 6 | 23% | 11 | 42% | 15 |
| Crisford, Simon | 128 | 29 | 23% | 58 | 45% | 33 |
| Suroor, Saeed Bin | 155 | 34 | 22% | 81 | 52% | -36 |
| Varian, Roger | 286 | 62 | 22% | 139 | 49% | -20 |
| Vaughan, E F | 38 | 8 | 21% | 11 | 29% | 24 |
| Watson, Archie | 249 | 52 | 21% | 97 | 39% | -23 |
| Bailey, K C | 24 | 5 | 21% | 11 | 46% | 18 |
| Rimell, M G | 44 | 9 | 20% | 21 | 48% | 52 |
| Palmer, Hugo | 222 | 43 | 19% | 94 | 42% | -5 |
| Guest, Rae | 79 | 15 | 19% | 32 | 41% | 2 |
| Allen, C N | 71 | 13 | 18% | 26 | 37% | -2 |
| Charlton, R | 264 | 46 | 17% | 95 | 36% | -7 |
| Boughey, George | 29 | 5 | 17% | 12 | 41% | -18 |
| Burrows, Owen | 76 | 13 | 17% | 35 | 46% | -16 |
| Stoute, Sir Michael | 200 | 34 | 17% | 89 | 45% | -30 |
| Haggas, W J | 197 | 33 | 17% | 87 | 44% | -81 |
| Ward, Tom | 74 | 12 | 16% | 28 | 38% | -1 |
| Ferguson, James | 31 | 5 | 16% | 13 | 42% | 4 |
| Balding, A M | 356 | 57 | 16% | 130 | 37% | 35 |
| Beckett, R M | 279 | 43 | 15% | 105 | 38% | -24 |
| Given, J G | 26 | 4 | 15% | 8 | 31% | 17 |
| Eustace, J M P | 91 | 14 | 15% | 29 | 32% | 34 |
| Dalgleish, Keith | 40 | 6 | 15% | 10 | 25% | 23 |
| Walker, Ed | 286 | 42 | 15% | 119 | 42% | -85 |
| Johnston, M | 343 | 49 | 14% | 107 | 31% | -41 |
| Margarson, G G | 58 | 8 | 14% | 22 | 38% | 32 |
| Elsworth, D R C | 147 | 20 | 14% | 47 | 32% | 32 |
| Tate, James | 164 | 22 | 13% | 63 | 38% | -40 |
| Hodgson, Simon | 30 | 4 | 13% | 8 | 27% | 3 |
| Fanshawe, J R | 302 | 39 | 13% | 117 | 39% | -144 |
| Bosley, M R | 31 | 4 | 13% | 7 | 23% | 7 |
| Baker, George | 173 | 22 | 13% | 50 | 29% | 29 |
| Cumani, L M | 40 | 5 | 13% | 17 | 43% | -22 |
| Loughnane, David | 97 | 12 | 12% | 36 | 37% | 42 |
| Simcock, D M | 254 | 31 | 12% | 90 | 35% | -81 |
| Cox, C G | 316 | 38 | 12% | 108 | 34% | -10 |
| Long, J E | 42 | 5 | 12% | 12 | 29% | 50 |
| Williams, S C | 253 | 30 | 12% | 83 | 33% | -19 |
| Guest, R C | 60 | 7 | 12% | 15 | 25% | -19 |
| Hills, Charles | 219 | 25 | 11% | 70 | 32% | 17 |
| Morrison, H | 194 | 22 | 11% | 53 | 27% | -67 |
| Keightley, S L | 89 | 10 | 11% | 22 | 25% | -16 |
| Cole, P F I | 138 | 15 | 11% | 41 | 30% | -20 |
| Botti, M | 379 | 41 | 11% | 122 | 32% | -127 |
| Hannon (Jnr), Richard | 659 | 71 | 11% | 198 | 30% | -142 |
| Wall, C F | 112 | 12 | 11% | 36 | 32% | -14 |
| Turner, W G M | 28 | 3 | 11% | 6 | 21% | -8 |
| Wigham, M | 56 | 6 | 11% | 16 | 29% | -36 |
| Prescott, Sir Mark | 169 | 18 | 11% | 43 | 25% | -54 |
| Knight, W J | 248 | 26 | 10% | 64 | 26% | -37 |
| Osborne, J A | 229 | 24 | 10% | 66 | 29% | -10 |
| McEntee, P S | 105 | 11 | 10% | 26 | 25% | -23 |
| McBride, P J | 67 | 7 | 10% | 19 | 28% | -31 |
| King, A | 163 | 17 | 10% | 42 | 26% | -48 |
| Hughes, Richard | 307 | 32 | 10% | 104 | 34% | -64 |
| Johnson, B R | 116 | 12 | 10% | 37 | 32% | 6 |
| Dascombe, Tom | 68 | 7 | 10% | 16 | 24% | -20 |
| Meehan, B J | 68 | 7 | 10% | 26 | 38% | -5 |
| Powell, B G | 49 | 5 | 10% | 14 | 29% | -10 |
| Gallagher, J | 49 | 5 | 10% | 13 | 27% | -10 |
| Appleby, M | 255 | 26 | 10% | 73 | 29% | -54 |
| Fahey, R A | 79 | 8 | 10% | 18 | 23% | -8 |
| Cowell, R M H | 99 | 10 | 10% | 31 | 31% | -26 |
| Gansera-Leveque,s Ilka | 20 | 2 | 10% | 5 | 25% | -3 |
| Muir, W R | 110 | 11 | 10% | 33 | 30% | -11 |
| Brisbourne, W M | 20 | 2 | 10% | 5 | 25% | 20 |
| Evans, H J | 20 | 2 | 10% | 5 | 25% | -7 |
| Murphy, Amy | 91 | 9 | 10% | 23 | 25% | 39 |
| Butler, John | 263 | 26 | 10% | 64 | 24% | -76 |
| Smith, Martin | 52 | 5 | 10% | 17 | 33% | 10 |
| Candy, H | 126 | 12 | 10% | 46 | 37% | -38 |
| Dwyer, C A | 42 | 4 | 10% | 15 | 36% | -16 |
| Carson, Anthony | 53 | 5 | 9% | 12 | 23% | 15 |
| Wadham,s L | 32 | 3 | 9% | 9 | 28% | -16 |
| Harris, M F | 32 | 3 | 9% | 13 | 41% | -10 |
| Millman, B R | 161 | 15 | 9% | 42 | 26% | -58 |
| Teal, R A | 76 | 7 | 9% | 21 | 28% | -4 |
| Best, Suzi | 22 | 2 | 9% | 3 | 14% | 3 |
| Fellowes, Charlie | 177 | 16 | 9% | 54 | 31% | -106 |
| Moore, G L | 290 | 26 | 9% | 75 | 26% | -97 |
| Jenkins, J R | 168 | 15 | 9% | 42 | 25% | -46 |
| Owen, Miss Emma L | 79 | 7 | 9% | 19 | 24% | -30 |
| Main,s H S | 102 | 9 | 9% | 35 | 34% | -26 |
| Kirk, S | 206 | 18 | 9% | 43 | 21% | -52 |
| Loughnane, Daniel Mark | 207 | 18 | 9% | 55 | 27% | -33 |
| Dow, S | 223 | 19 | 9% | 50 | 22% | -38 |
| Meade, M | 47 | 4 | 9% | 12 | 26% | -9 |
| Dunnett,s C A | 59 | 5 | 8% | 16 | 27% | 23 |
| Harris, R A | 96 | 8 | 8% | 21 | 22% | -30 |
| Perrett,s A J | 230 | 19 | 8% | 67 | 29% | -124 |
| Furtado, Ivan | 85 | 7 | 8% | 18 | 21% | -39 |
| Jarvis, W | 61 | 5 | 8% | 15 | 25% | -18 |
| Frost, Kevin | 49 | 4 | 8% | 8 | 16% | -4 |
| Stephens, Robert | 49 | 4 | 8% | 16 | 33% | 15 |
| Tuite, Joseph | 173 | 14 | 8% | 45 | 26% | -91 |
To qualify a jockey and trainer combination has to have teamed up in a minimum of 20 races at Kempton in the last 5 years.
Top 100 Jockey / Trainer Combinations
| Jockey | Trainer | B | W | W% | P | P% | P/L |
| Crowley, Jim | Gosden, J H M | 22 | 10 | 45% | 15 | 68% | 6 |
| Doyle, James | Appleby, Charlie | 22 | 9 | 41% | 16 | 73% | -5 |
| Buick, William | Appleby, Charlie | 63 | 25 | 40% | 41 | 65% | -2 |
| Crowley, Jim | Varian, Roger | 29 | 9 | 31% | 22 | 76% | 2 |
| Murphy, Oisin | Beckett, R M | 23 | 7 | 30% | 15 | 65% | 27 |
| Doyle, Hollie | Carroll, A W | 20 | 6 | 30% | 11 | 55% | 30 |
| Murphy, Oisin | Suroor, Saeed Bin | 34 | 10 | 29% | 18 | 53% | -1 |
| McDonald, P J | Williams, S C | 21 | 6 | 29% | 10 | 48% | 18 |
| Doyle, James | Palmer, Hugo | 53 | 15 | 28% | 27 | 51% | 30 |
| Havlin, Robert | Gosden, J H M | 165 | 46 | 28% | 89 | 54% | -5 |
| Egan, David | Varian, Roger | 37 | 10 | 27% | 18 | 49% | 5 |
| Murphy, Oisin | Millman, B R | 23 | 6 | 26% | 11 | 48% | 25 |
| Murphy, Oisin | Watson, Archie | 28 | 7 | 25% | 13 | 46% | -5 |
| Keniry, L P | Morrison, H | 20 | 5 | 25% | 7 | 35% | 13 |
| Dwyer, Martin | Allen, C N | 37 | 9 | 24% | 16 | 43% | 16 |
| Doyle, James | Haggas, W J | 33 | 8 | 24% | 16 | 48% | -0 |
| Probert, David | Jenkins, J R | 25 | 6 | 24% | 10 | 40% | 19 |
| Greatrex, Edward | Watson, Archie | 59 | 14 | 24% | 25 | 42% | 18 |
| Morris, Luke | Walker, Ed | 38 | 9 | 24% | 19 | 50% | -2 |
| Atzeni, Andrea | Varian, Roger | 86 | 20 | 23% | 48 | 56% | 1 |
| Crowley, Jim | Haggas, W J | 22 | 5 | 23% | 10 | 45% | -11 |
| Mitchell, Jack | Varian, Roger | 69 | 15 | 22% | 27 | 39% | 7 |
| Moore, Ryan | Stoute, Sir Michael | 46 | 10 | 22% | 26 | 57% | 3 |
| Shepherd, Callum | Simcock, D M | 37 | 8 | 22% | 14 | 38% | 20 |
| Murphy, Oisin | Balding, A M | 80 | 17 | 21% | 36 | 45% | 15 |
| Fanning, Joe | Johnston, M | 81 | 17 | 21% | 26 | 32% | -3 |
| Marquand, Tom | Ward, Tom | 24 | 5 | 21% | 8 | 33% | 8 |
| Norton, Francis | Wigham, M | 24 | 5 | 21% | 8 | 33% | -7 |
| Currie, Nicola | Baker, George | 29 | 6 | 21% | 10 | 34% | 36 |
| Gordon, Josephine | Palmer, Hugo | 50 | 10 | 20% | 18 | 36% | 4 |
| Murphy, Oisin | Morrison, H | 20 | 4 | 20% | 9 | 45% | -1 |
| McNamara, Adam | Charlton, R | 30 | 6 | 20% | 14 | 47% | 18 |
| Harley, M | Tate, James | 20 | 4 | 20% | 12 | 60% | -6 |
| Shoemark, Kieran | Hills, Charles | 40 | 8 | 20% | 18 | 45% | 32 |
| Tate, Ryan | Eustace, J M P | 53 | 10 | 19% | 20 | 38% | 47 |
| McDonald, P J | Tate, James | 32 | 6 | 19% | 16 | 50% | 2 |
| Hornby, Rob | Beckett, R M | 32 | 6 | 19% | 13 | 41% | 2 |
| Probert, David | Balding, A M | 104 | 19 | 18% | 33 | 32% | 52 |
| Doyle, Hollie | Watson, Archie | 84 | 15 | 18% | 32 | 38% | -29 |
| Crowley, Jim | Burrows, Owen | 29 | 5 | 17% | 12 | 41% | -6 |
| Queally, T P | Fanshawe, J R | 35 | 6 | 17% | 17 | 49% | -15 |
| Shoemark, Kieran | Charlton, R | 76 | 13 | 17% | 28 | 37% | 21 |
| Dobbs, Pat | Hannon (Jnr), Richard | 42 | 7 | 17% | 12 | 29% | -7 |
| Marsh, Finley | Hughes, Richard | 24 | 4 | 17% | 10 | 42% | 46 |
| Elliott, Jane | Margarson, G G | 24 | 4 | 17% | 10 | 42% | 33 |
| Crowley, Jim | Perrett,s A J | 24 | 4 | 17% | 9 | 38% | -7 |
| Morris, Luke | Bradley, J M | 24 | 4 | 17% | 8 | 33% | 15 |
| Doyle, James | Gosden, J H M | 24 | 4 | 17% | 9 | 38% | -11 |
| Spencer, Jamie | Simcock, D M | 61 | 10 | 16% | 27 | 44% | -15 |
| Cherchi, Stefano | Botti, M | 43 | 7 | 16% | 11 | 26% | -7 |
| Greatrex, Edward | Loughnane, Daniel Mark | 31 | 5 | 16% | 10 | 32% | 23 |
| Havlin, Robert | Perrett,s A J | 31 | 5 | 16% | 16 | 52% | -5 |
| Bentley, Harry | Beckett, R M | 77 | 12 | 16% | 33 | 43% | -2 |
| Mackay, Nicky | Gosden, J H M | 45 | 7 | 16% | 16 | 36% | -8 |
| Murphy, Oisin | Williams, S C | 39 | 6 | 15% | 17 | 44% | -10 |
| Durcan, Ted | Stoute, Sir Michael | 26 | 4 | 15% | 9 | 35% | -5 |
| Hornby, Rob | Balding, A M | 46 | 7 | 15% | 22 | 48% | -1 |
| Kingscote, Richard | Portman, J G | 20 | 3 | 15% | 5 | 25% | -1 |
| Murphy, Oisin | Walker, Ed | 20 | 3 | 15% | 10 | 50% | -10 |
| Crowley, Jim | Stoute, Sir Michael | 20 | 3 | 15% | 8 | 40% | -10 |
| Saunders, Tyler | Portman, J G | 27 | 4 | 15% | 9 | 33% | -1 |
| Berry, F M | Candy, H | 27 | 4 | 15% | 9 | 33% | 13 |
| Dwyer, Martin | Ivory, D K | 21 | 3 | 14% | 6 | 29% | 1 |
| Bryan, Joshua | Balding, A M | 21 | 3 | 14% | 8 | 38% | -2 |
| Kirby, Adam | Cox, C G | 154 | 22 | 14% | 62 | 40% | -42 |
| Egan, John | Dow, S | 28 | 4 | 14% | 6 | 21% | 71 |
| Rawlinson, Ali | Appleby, M | 71 | 10 | 14% | 23 | 32% | -1 |
| Norton, Francis | Johnston, M | 86 | 12 | 14% | 26 | 30% | -1 |
| Marquand, Tom | Dow, S | 36 | 5 | 14% | 13 | 36% | 6 |
| Watson, Jason | Charlton, R | 51 | 7 | 14% | 16 | 31% | -8 |
| Kingscote, Richard | Beckett, R M | 51 | 7 | 14% | 19 | 37% | -0 |
| Marquand, Tom | King, A | 22 | 3 | 14% | 5 | 23% | 4 |
| Sousa, Silvestre De | Johnston, M | 22 | 3 | 14% | 8 | 36% | -6 |
| Morris, Luke | Prescott, Sir Mark | 113 | 15 | 13% | 33 | 29% | -17 |
| Wood, George | Fanshawe, J R | 83 | 11 | 13% | 28 | 34% | -40 |
| Kingscote, Richard | Dascombe, Tom | 38 | 5 | 13% | 10 | 26% | -7 |
| Morris, Luke | Cowell, R M H | 23 | 3 | 13% | 8 | 35% | 6 |
| Kelly, Shane | Moore, G L | 31 | 4 | 13% | 6 | 19% | -17 |
| Harley, M | King, A | 39 | 5 | 13% | 8 | 21% | -14 |
| Winston, Robert | Ivory, D K | 64 | 8 | 13% | 20 | 31% | 5 |
| Probert, David | Harris, R A | 33 | 4 | 12% | 11 | 33% | -7 |
| Dwyer, Martin | Muir, W R | 58 | 7 | 12% | 20 | 34% | 26 |
| Fox, Kieren | Best, J R | 75 | 9 | 12% | 23 | 31% | -15 |
| Murphy, Oisin | Tuite, Joseph | 25 | 3 | 12% | 6 | 24% | -13 |
| Probert, David | Usher, M D I | 25 | 3 | 12% | 6 | 24% | 5 |
| Monaghan, M M | Botti, M | 42 | 5 | 12% | 12 | 29% | -4 |
| Ryan, Rossa | Hannon (Jnr), Richard | 77 | 9 | 12% | 24 | 31% | 3 |
| Shepherd, Callum | Johnson, B R | 26 | 3 | 12% | 10 | 38% | 2 |
| Keniry, L P | Walker, Ed | 87 | 10 | 11% | 32 | 37% | -35 |
| Marquand, Tom | Haggas, W J | 35 | 4 | 11% | 18 | 51% | -17 |
| Hansen, Thore | Hannon (Jnr), Richard | 35 | 4 | 11% | 10 | 29% | -3 |
| Marquand, Tom | Carroll, A W | 70 | 8 | 11% | 19 | 27% | -12 |
| McDonald, P J | Johnston, M | 35 | 4 | 11% | 11 | 31% | 12 |
| Marquand, Tom | Walker, Ed | 27 | 3 | 11% | 13 | 48% | -11 |
| Watson, Jason | Knight, W J | 27 | 3 | 11% | 4 | 15% | -1 |
| Bishop, Charles | Tuite, Joseph | 36 | 4 | 11% | 10 | 28% | -2 |
| Currie, Nicola | Osborne, J A | 74 | 8 | 11% | 20 | 27% | 5 |
| Morris, Luke | Tate, James | 28 | 3 | 11% | 8 | 29% | -18 |
| Doyle, Hollie | Hannon (Jnr), Richard | 38 | 4 | 11% | 14 | 37% | -5 |
| Bishop, Charles | Channon, M R | 30 | 3 | 10% | 13 | 43% | -10 |
To qualify a sires progeny needs to have run a minimum of 20 races at Kempton in the last 5 years.
Top 100 Stallions
| B | W | W% | P | P% | P/L | |
| Elnadim (USA) | 30 | 7 | 23% | 11 | 37% | 11 |
| Night Of Thunder (IRE) | 49 | 11 | 22% | 25 | 51% | 8 |
| Distorted Humor (USA) | 27 | 6 | 22% | 12 | 44% | 9 |
| Ivawood (IRE) | 39 | 8 | 21% | 15 | 38% | 83 |
| Scat Daddy (USA) | 44 | 9 | 20% | 14 | 32% | 34 |
| Frankel | 119 | 24 | 20% | 53 | 45% | -28 |
| The Factor (USA) | 25 | 5 | 20% | 9 | 36% | -2 |
| Choisir (AUS) | 61 | 12 | 20% | 17 | 28% | -1 |
| Rail Link | 72 | 14 | 19% | 27 | 38% | 60 |
| Dubawi (IRE) | 279 | 54 | 19% | 106 | 38% | -141 |
| Elusive Pimpernel (USA) | 26 | 5 | 19% | 11 | 42% | 28 |
| Shamardal (USA) | 226 | 43 | 19% | 98 | 43% | 37 |
| Lord Shanakill (USA) | 37 | 7 | 19% | 14 | 38% | -2 |
| Kingman | 109 | 20 | 18% | 46 | 42% | -28 |
| Make Believe | 33 | 6 | 18% | 13 | 39% | 14 |
| No Nay Never (USA) | 73 | 13 | 18% | 26 | 36% | 33 |
| Halling (USA) | 45 | 8 | 18% | 17 | 38% | 11 |
| Elusive Quality (USA) | 63 | 11 | 17% | 14 | 22% | 2 |
| Lemon Drop Kid (USA) | 23 | 4 | 17% | 9 | 39% | -8 |
| High Chaparral (IRE) | 120 | 20 | 17% | 40 | 33% | 45 |
| Lonhro (AUS) | 24 | 4 | 17% | 8 | 33% | 8 |
| Haatef (USA) | 24 | 4 | 17% | 6 | 25% | -1 |
| Siyouni (FR) | 121 | 20 | 17% | 46 | 38% | 21 |
| Australia | 93 | 15 | 16% | 27 | 29% | 11 |
| Kittens Joy (USA) | 56 | 9 | 16% | 19 | 34% | -15 |
| Ravens Pass (USA) | 137 | 22 | 16% | 40 | 29% | -16 |
| Dansili | 206 | 33 | 16% | 73 | 35% | -17 |
| Golden Horn | 63 | 10 | 16% | 18 | 29% | -29 |
| Makfi | 76 | 12 | 16% | 23 | 30% | 43 |
| Aqlaam | 78 | 12 | 15% | 27 | 35% | -8 |
| First Defence (USA) | 26 | 4 | 15% | 9 | 35% | 5 |
| Lethal Force (IRE) | 190 | 29 | 15% | 63 | 33% | 17 |
| Dragon Pulse (IRE) | 118 | 18 | 15% | 39 | 33% | 67 |
| Farhh | 46 | 7 | 15% | 13 | 28% | -21 |
| Toronado (IRE) | 92 | 14 | 15% | 39 | 42% | -10 |
| Rip Van Winkle (IRE) | 153 | 23 | 15% | 45 | 29% | 19 |
| Delegator | 224 | 33 | 15% | 74 | 33% | 52 |
| Elusive City (USA) | 34 | 5 | 15% | 11 | 32% | -5 |
| Swiss Spirit | 164 | 24 | 15% | 53 | 32% | -13 |
| Aussie Rules (USA) | 48 | 7 | 15% | 15 | 31% | -21 |
| Alhebayeb (IRE) | 55 | 8 | 15% | 16 | 29% | 35 |
| Sea The Stars (IRE) | 179 | 26 | 15% | 59 | 33% | -85 |
| Exceed And Excel (AUS) | 371 | 53 | 14% | 121 | 33% | -16 |
| Intello (GER) | 84 | 12 | 14% | 30 | 36% | -23 |
| Awtaad (IRE) | 28 | 4 | 14% | 8 | 29% | -4 |
| Sepoy (AUS) | 240 | 34 | 14% | 88 | 37% | -47 |
| Gutaifan (IRE) | 64 | 9 | 14% | 18 | 28% | 12 |
| War Front (USA) | 79 | 11 | 14% | 35 | 44% | -43 |
| Noble Mission | 36 | 5 | 14% | 13 | 36% | -1 |
| Sir Percy | 246 | 34 | 14% | 76 | 31% | -2 |
| Tamayuz | 81 | 11 | 14% | 22 | 27% | -40 |
| Monsieur Bond (IRE) | 59 | 8 | 14% | 16 | 27% | 57 |
| Mehmas (IRE) | 37 | 5 | 14% | 18 | 49% | -5 |
| Mayson | 164 | 22 | 13% | 56 | 34% | -14 |
| Intikhab (USA) | 60 | 8 | 13% | 22 | 37% | -20 |
| Morpheus | 30 | 4 | 13% | 11 | 37% | 2 |
| Dream Ahead (USA) | 128 | 17 | 13% | 48 | 38% | -19 |
| Smart Strike (CAN) | 23 | 3 | 13% | 5 | 22% | -5 |
| Pivotal | 154 | 20 | 13% | 48 | 31% | -17 |
| Medaglia Doro (USA) | 39 | 5 | 13% | 13 | 33% | 7 |
| Kodiac | 566 | 71 | 13% | 171 | 30% | -101 |
| Charm Spirit (IRE) | 80 | 10 | 13% | 27 | 34% | 6 |
| Due Diligence (USA) | 56 | 7 | 13% | 14 | 25% | -29 |
| Bated Breath | 246 | 30 | 12% | 77 | 31% | -105 |
| Sir Prancealot (IRE) | 150 | 18 | 12% | 50 | 33% | -31 |
| Nathaniel (IRE) | 211 | 25 | 12% | 75 | 36% | -56 |
| Brazen Beau (AUS) | 51 | 6 | 12% | 13 | 25% | -20 |
| Footstepsinthesand | 145 | 17 | 12% | 31 | 21% | -44 |
| Red Jazz (USA) | 43 | 5 | 12% | 11 | 26% | 9 |
| Dutch Art | 311 | 36 | 12% | 94 | 30% | 14 |
| Vadamos (FR) | 26 | 3 | 12% | 6 | 23% | 10 |
| Bahamian Bounty | 123 | 14 | 11% | 36 | 29% | -27 |
| Mukhadram | 97 | 11 | 11% | 29 | 30% | 4 |
| Kendargent (FR) | 53 | 6 | 11% | 14 | 26% | -7 |
| Showcasing | 293 | 33 | 11% | 107 | 37% | -12 |
| Cable Bay (IRE) | 98 | 11 | 11% | 33 | 34% | 33 |
| Paco Boy (IRE) | 199 | 22 | 11% | 54 | 27% | 2 |
| Oasis Dream | 303 | 33 | 11% | 97 | 32% | -75 |
| Invincible Spirit (IRE) | 288 | 31 | 11% | 104 | 36% | -137 |
| Free Eagle (IRE) | 28 | 3 | 11% | 9 | 32% | -19 |
| Requinto (IRE) | 56 | 6 | 11% | 10 | 18% | -29 |
| Speightstown (USA) | 47 | 5 | 11% | 11 | 23% | -28 |
| Leroidesanimaux (BRZ) | 47 | 5 | 11% | 19 | 40% | -10 |
| Camacho | 199 | 21 | 11% | 46 | 23% | 17 |
| Muhaarar | 76 | 8 | 11% | 24 | 32% | 69 |
| Street Cry (IRE) | 95 | 10 | 11% | 25 | 26% | -62 |
| Redoutes Choice (AUS) | 38 | 4 | 11% | 13 | 34% | -24 |
| Assertive | 38 | 4 | 11% | 9 | 24% | -12 |
| Lilbourne Lad (IRE) | 87 | 9 | 10% | 24 | 28% | -49 |
| Cityscape | 68 | 7 | 10% | 20 | 29% | -4 |
| Gleneagles (IRE) | 50 | 5 | 10% | 16 | 32% | -26 |
| Lawman (FR) | 171 | 17 | 10% | 47 | 27% | -60 |
| Dawn Approach (IRE) | 111 | 11 | 10% | 32 | 29% | -59 |
| Canford Cliffs (IRE) | 182 | 18 | 10% | 46 | 25% | -12 |
| Elzaam (AUS) | 51 | 5 | 10% | 17 | 33% | -24 |
| Dark Angel (IRE) | 494 | 48 | 10% | 142 | 29% | -213 |
| Baltic King | 31 | 3 | 10% | 9 | 29% | 4 |
| Iffraaj | 280 | 27 | 10% | 86 | 31% | -109 |
| New Approach (IRE) | 156 | 15 | 10% | 47 | 30% | -88 |
| Medicean | 136 | 13 | 10% | 34 | 25% | 31 |
© 2021, One Stop Racing. All rights reserved.