Chelmsford City racecourse statistics for the all-weather flat course.
The statisticians here at One Stop Racing have compiled a wealth of data for the All-Weather course at Chelmsford City.
Scroll down and you will discover Chelmsford City (AW) Favourite Statistics, Chelmsford City (AW) Draw Analysis, Chelmsford City (AW) leading Jockey, Trainer and Sire data.
Chelmsford City Favourite Statistics
All these statistics were independently collected by us over the last 5 years.
| Bets | Wins | P/L | Win% | Places | Place% | |
| All Favs | 2309 | 791 | -64 | 34% | 1431 | 62% |
| Outright Favs | 1918 | 684 | -112 | 36% | 1221 | 64% |
| Joint Favs | 333 | 92 | 32 | 28% | 183 | 55% |
| Co Favs | 58 | 15 | 16 | 26% | 27 | 47% |
| 2nd Favs | 2212 | 445 | -287 | 20% | 1099 | 50% |
Chelmsford City All-Weather draw analysis
All these statistics were independently collected by us from 1st January 2011 to the present day.
To qualify for our analysis races must have a minimum of 8 runners.
We have tracked which stall the winner and placed horses came from in every qualifying race, we only collect data on 3 places despite the size of the field or any bookmakers offering extra places in a specific races.
In the case of 2 horses dead heating for 1st place both are counted as winners.
For the number of wins and places that each stall has, wins are included as places, so if a stall has 2 wins and 4 places, that stall has technically placed 6 times, when we calculate the place percentage of a certain stall we will include wins in those statistics. All percentages have been calculated on how many times that stall has been used.
5f
6f
7f
1m
1m 2f
1m 5½f
1m 6f
2m
Chelmsford City (AW) 5 furlong draw analysis.
We tracked 159 races, in total there were 1518 runners.
| Bets | Wins | Win% | P/L(SP) | Places | Place% | Races |
| 1518 | 160 | 10.54 | -460.23 | 478 | 31.49 | 159 |
Draw data broken down by stall
This illustrates the Chelmsford City (AW) draw bias for 5 furlongs
| Stall | Bets | Wins | Win% | P/L(SP) | Places | Place% | Races |
| 1 | 154 | 23 | 14.94 | -45.91 | 60 | 38.96 | 154 |
| 2 | 154 | 21 | 13.64 | -24 | 61 | 39.61 | 154 |
| 3 | 152 | 10 | 6.58 | -92.47 | 51 | 33.55 | 152 |
| 4 | 154 | 19 | 12.34 | -40.54 | 59 | 38.31 | 154 |
| 5 | 156 | 17 | 10.9 | -57.75 | 42 | 26.92 | 156 |
| 6 | 154 | 16 | 10.39 | -68.46 | 57 | 37.01 | 154 |
| 7 | 155 | 21 | 13.55 | 9.13 | 52 | 33.55 | 155 |
| 8 | 151 | 13 | 8.61 | -54.43 | 43 | 28.48 | 151 |
| 9 | 117 | 8 | 6.84 | -55.55 | 21 | 17.95 | 117 |
| 10 | 77 | 8 | 10.39 | 7 | 20 | 25.97 | 77 |
| 11 | 55 | 3 | 5.45 | -1 | 8 | 14.55 | 55 |
| 12 | 39 | 1 | 2.56 | -36.25 | 4 | 10.26 | 39 |
Running style analysis
Analysis of running style using last 200 races in Chelmsford City (AW) races at distance of 5 furlongs.
| Running Style | Runners | Wins | Strike Rate | P/L (SP) |
| Front Runner | 271 | 70 | 25.83% | 134.30 |
| Prominent | 427 | 62 | 14.52% | -103.53 |
| Tracked/Chased | 193 | 23 | 11.92% | -44.09 |
| Mid Division | 131 | 11 | 8.4% | -73.25 |
| Held Up | 483 | 31 | 6.42% | -281.66 |
| Poor Start | 68 | 2 | 2.94% | -57.00 |
Chelmsford City (AW) 6 furlong draw analysis.
We tracked 362 races, in total there were 3665 runners.
| Bets | Wins | Win% | P/L(SP) | Places | Place% | Races |
| 3665 | 362 | 9.88 | -789.47 | 1087 | 29.66 | 362 |
Draw data broken down by stall
This illustrates the Chelmsford City (AW) draw bias for 6 furlongs
| Stall | Bets | Wins | Win% | P/L(SP) | Places | Place% | Races |
| 1 | 342 | 39 | 11.4 | -83.7 | 131 | 38.3 | 342 |
| 2 | 343 | 37 | 10.79 | -106.76 | 116 | 33.82 | 343 |
| 3 | 346 | 35 | 10.12 | -140.47 | 107 | 30.92 | 346 |
| 4 | 345 | 37 | 10.72 | -136.89 | 121 | 35.07 | 345 |
| 5 | 342 | 26 | 7.6 | -179.18 | 105 | 30.7 | 342 |
| 6 | 349 | 37 | 10.6 | 1 | 102 | 29.23 | 349 |
| 7 | 343 | 42 | 12.24 | 69.33 | 112 | 32.65 | 343 |
| 8 | 341 | 30 | 8.8 | -91.93 | 92 | 26.98 | 341 |
| 9 | 292 | 23 | 7.88 | -21.16 | 56 | 19.18 | 292 |
| 10 | 219 | 34 | 15.53 | 94.54 | 71 | 32.42 | 219 |
| 11 | 152 | 8 | 5.26 | -85.75 | 34 | 22.37 | 152 |
| 12 | 119 | 6 | 5.04 | -54.8 | 18 | 15.13 | 119 |
| 13 | 74 | 3 | 4.05 | -34 | 12 | 16.22 | 74 |
| 14 | 58 | 5 | 8.62 | -19.7 | 10 | 17.24 | 58 |
Running style analysis
Analysis of running style using last 200 races in Chelmsford City (AW) races at distance of 6 furlongs
| Running Style | Runners | Wins | Strike Rate | P/L (SP) |
| Front Runner | 292 | 53 | 18.15% | 55.97 |
| Prominent | 402 | 56 | 13.93% | 2.27 |
| Tracked/Chased | 217 | 23 | 10.6% | -63.11 |
| Mid Division | 213 | 22 | 10.33% | -19.62 |
| Held Up | 588 | 46 | 7.82% | -249.33 |
| Poor Start | 91 | 0 | 0% | -91.00 |
Chelmsford City (AW) 7 furlong draw analysis.
We tracked 377 races, in total there were 4035 runners.
| Bets | Wins | Win% | P/L(SP) | Places | Place% | Races |
| 4035 | 377 | 9.34 | -954.85 | 1131 | 28.03 | 377 |
Draw data broken down by stall
This illustrates the Chelmsford City (AW) draw bias for 7 furlongs
| Stall | Bets | Wins | Win% | P/L(SP) | Places |
| 1 | 359 | 43 | 11.98 | -58.91 | 126 |
| 2 | 359 | 32 | 8.91 | -164.18 | 105 |
| 3 | 355 | 45 | 12.68 | -64.5 | 129 |
| 4 | 361 | 38 | 10.53 | -115.39 | 112 |
| 5 | 361 | 33 | 9.14 | -138.82 | 103 |
| 6 | 362 | 34 | 9.39 | -103.6 | 109 |
| 7 | 364 | 35 | 9.62 | -21.04 | 93 |
| 8 | 354 | 26 | 7.34 | -129.37 | 102 |
| 9 | 321 | 27 | 8.41 | -17.16 | 80 |
| 10 | 264 | 19 | 7.2 | -135.75 | 62 |
| 11 | 193 | 7 | 3.63 | -129 | 28 |
| 12 | 147 | 18 | 12.24 | 72.12 | 38 |
| 13 | 101 | 9 | 8.91 | 24.75 | 21 |
| 14 | 75 | 8 | 10.67 | 42 | 16 |
| 15 | 41 | 2 | 4.88 | -13 | 6 |
| 16 | 18 | 1 | 5.56 | -3 | 1 |
Running style analysis
Analysis of running style using last 200 races in Chelmsford City (AW) races at distance of 7 furlongs
| Running Style | Runners | Wins | Strike Rate | P/L (SP) |
| Front Runner | 293 | 56 | 19.11% | 53.27 |
| Prominent | 418 | 64 | 15.31% | -71.20 |
| Tracked/Chased | 265 | 29 | 10.94% | 2.20 |
| Mid Division | 231 | 23 | 9.96% | -23.04 |
| Held Up | 614 | 27 | 4.4% | -382.66 |
| Poor Start | 75 | 1 | 1.33% | -72.37 |
Chelmsford City (AW) 1 mile draw analysis.
We tracked 420 races, in total there were 4457 runners.
| Bets | Wins | Win% | P/L(SP) | Places | Place% | Races |
| 4457 | 421 | 9.45 | -1240.58 | 1268 | 28.45 | 420 |
Draw data broken down by stall
This illustrates the Chelmsford City (AW) draw bias for 1 mile.
| Stall | Bets | Wins | Win% | P/L(SP) | Places | Place% | Races |
| 1 | 407 | 59 | 14.5 | -77.01 | 155 | 38.08 | 407 |
| 2 | 403 | 51 | 12.66 | -74.31 | 145 | 35.98 | 403 |
| 3 | 402 | 44 | 10.95 | -149.03 | 134 | 33.33 | 402 |
| 4 | 407 | 41 | 10.07 | -78.48 | 128 | 31.45 | 407 |
| 5 | 400 | 33 | 8.25 | -210.38 | 111 | 27.75 | 400 |
| 6 | 402 | 49 | 12.19 | -31.46 | 115 | 28.61 | 402 |
| 7 | 394 | 29 | 7.36 | -140.92 | 101 | 25.63 | 394 |
| 8 | 405 | 31 | 7.65 | -123.2 | 121 | 29.88 | 405 |
| 9 | 350 | 26 | 7.43 | -111.67 | 80 | 22.86 | 350 |
| 10 | 285 | 19 | 6.67 | -99.25 | 63 | 22.11 | 285 |
| 11 | 203 | 19 | 9.36 | 32.38 | 44 | 21.67 | 203 |
| 12 | 151 | 9 | 5.96 | -60 | 30 | 19.87 | 151 |
| 13 | 104 | 7 | 6.73 | -13.75 | 21 | 20.19 | 104 |
| 14 | 76 | 1 | 1.32 | -71.5 | 10 | 13.16 | 76 |
| 15 | 45 | 1 | 2.22 | -19 | 6 | 13.33 | 45 |
| 16 | 23 | 2 | 8.7 | -13 | 4 | 17.39 | 23 |
Running style analysis
Analysis of running style using last 200 races in Chelmsford City (AW) races at distance of 1 mile
| Running Style | Runners | Wins | Strike Rate | P/L (SP) |
| Front Runner | 271 | 61 | 22.51% | 145.40 |
| Prominent | 424 | 47 | 11.08% | -56.03 |
| Tracked/Chased | 259 | 32 | 12.36% | 21.70 |
| Mid Division | 206 | 12 | 5.83% | -31.58 |
| Held Up | 667 | 47 | 7.05% | -303.41 |
| Poor Start | 65 | 1 | 1.54% | -59.50 |
Chelmsford City (AW) 1 mile 2 furlongs draw analysis.
We tracked 353 races, in total there were 3730 runners.
| Bets | Wins | Win% | P/L(SP) | Places | Place% | Races |
| 3730 | 353 | 9.46 | -1156.46 | 1064 | 28.53 | 353 |
Draw data broken down by stall
This illustrates the Chelmsford City (AW) draw bias for 1 mile 2 furlongs.
| Stall | Bets | Wins | Win% | P/L(SP) | Places | Place% | Races |
| 1 | 344 | 41 | 11.92 | -143.57 | 114 | 33.14 | 344 |
| 2 | 338 | 39 | 11.54 | -83.08 | 117 | 34.62 | 338 |
| 3 | 335 | 37 | 11.04 | -16.86 | 91 | 27.16 | 335 |
| 4 | 332 | 34 | 10.24 | -85.59 | 99 | 29.82 | 332 |
| 5 | 337 | 34 | 10.09 | -72.59 | 117 | 34.72 | 337 |
| 6 | 335 | 36 | 10.75 | -101.41 | 106 | 31.64 | 335 |
| 7 | 339 | 32 | 9.44 | -122.77 | 100 | 29.5 | 339 |
| 8 | 338 | 26 | 7.69 | -142.81 | 88 | 26.04 | 338 |
| 9 | 288 | 23 | 7.99 | -80.29 | 74 | 25.69 | 288 |
| 10 | 219 | 11 | 5.02 | -119.75 | 43 | 19.63 | 219 |
| 11 | 178 | 19 | 10.67 | 6.63 | 41 | 23.03 | 178 |
| 12 | 131 | 4 | 3.05 | -111.25 | 30 | 22.9 | 131 |
| 13 | 91 | 11 | 12.09 | -20.12 | 20 | 21.98 | 91 |
| 14 | 61 | 3 | 4.92 | -36.5 | 12 | 19.67 | 61 |
| 15 | 46 | 2 | 4.35 | -23.5 | 8 | 17.39 | 46 |
| 16 | 18 | 1 | 5.56 | -3 | 4 | 22.22 | 18 |
Running style analysis
Analysis of running style using last 200 races in Chelmsford City (AW) races at distance of 1 mile 2 furlongs
| Running Style | Runners | Wins | Strike Rate | P/L (SP) |
| Front Runner | 267 | 46 | 17.23% | -58.80 |
| Prominent | 433 | 61 | 14.09% | -90.07 |
| Tracked/Chased | 270 | 30 | 11.11% | -98.36 |
| Mid Division | 207 | 14 | 6.76% | -16.17 |
| Held Up | 667 | 47 | 7.05% | -348.62 |
| Poor Start | 37 | 3 | 8.11% | -21.75 |
Chelmsford City (AW) 1 mile 5½ furlongs draw analysis.
We tracked 57 races, in total there were 560 runners.
| Bets | Wins | Win% | P/L(SP) | Places | Place% | Races |
| 560 | 57 | 10.18 | -209.1 | 171 | 30.54 | 57 |
Draw data broken down by stall
This illustrates the Chelmsford City (AW) draw bias for 1 mile 5½ furlongs.
| Stall | Bets | Wins | Win% | P/L(SP) | Places | Place% | Races |
| 1 | 54 | 3 | 5.56 | -36.87 | 13 | 24.07 | 54 |
| 2 | 54 | 4 | 7.41 | -21.5 | 21 | 38.89 | 54 |
| 3 | 56 | 7 | 12.5 | -36.4 | 24 | 42.86 | 56 |
| 4 | 55 | 6 | 10.91 | -30.87 | 14 | 25.45 | 55 |
| 5 | 55 | 6 | 10.91 | -24.25 | 20 | 36.36 | 55 |
| 6 | 54 | 7 | 12.96 | 21.75 | 23 | 42.59 | 54 |
| 7 | 54 | 7 | 12.96 | -18.62 | 15 | 27.78 | 54 |
| 8 | 56 | 6 | 10.71 | -18.75 | 17 | 30.36 | 56 |
| 9 | 39 | 3 | 7.69 | -10.75 | 10 | 25.64 | 39 |
| 10 | 29 | 4 | 13.79 | -9.09 | 6 | 20.69 | 29 |
| 11 | 16 | 0 | 0 | -16 | 0 | 0 | 16 |
| 12 | 15 | 2 | 13.33 | 1 | 5 | 33.33 | 15 |
| 13 | 13 | 0 | 0 | -13 | 0 | 0 | 13 |
| 14 | 10 | 2 | 20 | 4.25 | 3 | 30 | 10 |
Running style analysis
Analysis of running style using last 200 races in Chelmsford City (AW) races at distance of 1 mile 5½ furlongs.
| Running Style | Runners | Wins | Strike Rate | P/L (SP) |
| Front Runner | 149 | 25 | 16.78% | -43.74 |
| Prominent | 263 | 39 | 14.83% | -100.52 |
| Tracked/Chased | 111 | 14 | 12.61% | -7.75 |
| Mid Division | 58 | 6 | 10.34% | -37.37 |
| Held Up | 318 | 36 | 11.32% | -99.00 |
| Poor Start | 13 | 1 | 7.69% | 4.00 |
Chelmsford City (AW) 1 mile 6 furlongs draw analysis.
We tracked 58 races, in total there were 569 runners.
| Bets | Wins | Win% | P/L(SP) | Places | Place% | Races |
| 569 | 58 | 10.19 | -189.18 | 175 | 30.76 | 58 |
Draw data broken down by stall
This illustrates the Chelmsford City (AW) draw bias for 1 mile 6 furlongs.
| Stall | Bets | Wins | Win% | P/L(SP) | Places | Place% | Races |
| 1 | 57 | 12 | 21.05 | 11.42 | 24 | 42.11 | 57 |
| 2 | 57 | 7 | 12.28 | -5.37 | 18 | 31.58 | 57 |
| 3 | 55 | 4 | 7.27 | -17.12 | 13 | 23.64 | 55 |
| 4 | 51 | 2 | 3.92 | -41.37 | 14 | 27.45 | 51 |
| 5 | 56 | 7 | 12.5 | -10.77 | 22 | 39.29 | 56 |
| 6 | 52 | 6 | 11.54 | -25.62 | 17 | 32.69 | 52 |
| 7 | 55 | 6 | 10.91 | -21.25 | 15 | 27.27 | 55 |
| 8 | 57 | 3 | 5.26 | -36 | 19 | 33.33 | 57 |
| 9 | 49 | 4 | 8.16 | -35.5 | 12 | 24.49 | 49 |
| 10 | 34 | 2 | 5.88 | -13 | 10 | 29.41 | 34 |
| 11 | 18 | 1 | 5.56 | -9 | 5 | 27.78 | 18 |
| 12 | 13 | 1 | 7.69 | -11.6 | 2 | 15.38 | 13 |
| 13 | 9 | 2 | 22.22 | 17 | 2 | 22.22 | 9 |
| 14 | 4 | 0 | 0 | -4 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| 15 | 1 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 1 | 100 | 1 |
| 16 | 1 | 1 | 100 | 14 | 1 | 100 | 1 |
Running style analysis
Analysis of running style using last 200 races in Chelmsford City (AW) races at distance of 1 mile 6 furlongs.
| Running Style | Runners | Wins | Strike Rate | P/L (SP) |
| Front Runner | 163 | 28 | 17.18% | -21.21 |
| Prominent | 238 | 34 | 14.29% | -61.47 |
| Tracked/Chased | 105 | 10 | 9.52% | -65.40 |
| Mid Division | 68 | 9 | 13.24% | -26.58 |
| Held Up | 315 | 38 | 12.06% | -37.78 |
| Poor Start | 21 | 1 | 4.76% | -16.0 |
Chelmsford City (AW) 2 miles draw analysis.
We tracked 33 races, in total there were 297 runners.
| Bets | Wins | Win% | P/L(SP) | Places | Place% | Races |
| 297 | 33 | 11.11 | -99.35 | 99 | 33.33 | 33 |
Draw data broken down by stall
This illustrates the Chelmsford City (AW) draw bias for 2 miles.
| Stall | Bets | Wins | Win% | P/L(SP) | Places | Place% | Races |
| 1 | 31 | 1 | 3.23 | -22 | 6 | 19.35 | 31 |
| 2 | 32 | 5 | 15.63 | -17.62 | 14 | 43.75 | 32 |
| 3 | 31 | 4 | 12.9 | -5.5 | 7 | 22.58 | 31 |
| 4 | 32 | 6 | 18.75 | -7.79 | 13 | 40.63 | 32 |
| 5 | 33 | 2 | 6.06 | -26.25 | 17 | 51.52 | 33 |
| 6 | 32 | 2 | 6.25 | -26.17 | 11 | 34.38 | 32 |
| 7 | 30 | 4 | 13.33 | -5.62 | 7 | 23.33 | 30 |
| 8 | 33 | 3 | 9.09 | -18.4 | 9 | 27.27 | 33 |
| 9 | 21 | 3 | 14.29 | 29 | 7 | 33.33 | 21 |
| 10 | 14 | 1 | 7.14 | -7 | 5 | 35.71 | 14 |
| 11 | 7 | 2 | 28.57 | 9 | 3 | 42.86 | 7 |
| 12 | 1 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Running style analysis
Analysis of running style using last 200 races in Chelmsford City (AW) races at distance of 2 miles.
| Running Style | Runners | Wins | Strike Rate | P/L (SP) |
| Front Runner | 118 | 24 | 20.34% | -9.93 |
| Prominent | 171 | 26 | 15.2% | -64.66 |
| Tracked/Chased | 56 | 8 | 14.29% | -23.35 |
| Mid Division | 30 | 1 | 3.33% | -22.00 |
| Held Up | 237 | 30 | 12.66% | -70.99 |
| Poor Start | 8 | 0 | 0% | -8.00 |
Chelmsford City (AW) Jockey, Trainer and Sire Data.
All these statistics were independently collected by us over the last 5 years. .
Key: B – Bets, W – Wins, W% – win percentage, P – Places, P% – place percentage, P/L – profit / loss (WIN ONLY) to a 1 point stake.
Jockeys
Trainers
Jockey / Trainer
Sires
To qualify a jockey has to have had a minimum of 20 rides at Cheltenham City (AW) in the last 5 years.
Top 100 Jockeys
| B | W | W% | P | P% | P/L | |
| Dettori, L | 36 | 12 | 33% | 20 | 56% | -3 |
| Moore, Ryan | 137 | 43 | 31% | 68 | 50% | 13 |
| Stott, Kevin | 43 | 12 | 28% | 20 | 47% | 39 |
| Doyle, James | 185 | 46 | 25% | 99 | 54% | -54 |
| Crowley, Jim | 226 | 56 | 25% | 102 | 45% | 11 |
| Murphy, Oisin | 313 | 69 | 22% | 153 | 49% | -12 |
| Baker, George | 28 | 6 | 21% | 12 | 43% | 5 |
| Rodriguez, Callum | 25 | 5 | 20% | 8 | 32% | 11 |
| Bridgwater, Poppy | 31 | 6 | 19% | 9 | 29% | 15 |
| Tart, Robert | 31 | 6 | 19% | 12 | 39% | -4 |
| McDonald, P J | 222 | 42 | 19% | 83 | 37% | 51 |
| Hart, Jason | 117 | 21 | 18% | 47 | 40% | -10 |
| Marsh, Finley | 67 | 12 | 18% | 30 | 45% | 35 |
| Sousa, Silvestre De | 231 | 41 | 18% | 83 | 36% | -56 |
| Kingscote, Richard | 187 | 33 | 18% | 79 | 42% | 27 |
| Tudhope, Daniel | 57 | 10 | 18% | 24 | 42% | -11 |
| Buick, William | 93 | 16 | 17% | 38 | 41% | -21 |
| Kirby, Adam | 351 | 60 | 17% | 131 | 37% | -74 |
| Spencer, Jamie | 129 | 22 | 17% | 52 | 40% | -59 |
| Beasley, Connor | 47 | 8 | 17% | 12 | 26% | 2 |
| Harley, M | 202 | 34 | 17% | 76 | 38% | -2 |
| Atzeni, Andrea | 119 | 20 | 17% | 43 | 36% | -29 |
| Uys, Jordan | 24 | 4 | 17% | 9 | 38% | 0 |
| Heard, Tyler | 37 | 6 | 16% | 12 | 32% | 8 |
| Lane, Martin | 82 | 13 | 16% | 17 | 21% | -12 |
| Havlin, Robert | 330 | 52 | 16% | 124 | 38% | -80 |
| Stanford, Lulu | 26 | 4 | 15% | 9 | 35% | -2 |
| Monaghan, M M | 39 | 6 | 15% | 17 | 44% | 41 |
| Dawson, R | 112 | 17 | 15% | 35 | 31% | 19 |
| Curtis, B A | 173 | 26 | 15% | 65 | 38% | -6 |
| Carver, William | 40 | 6 | 15% | 12 | 30% | 6 |
| Shoemark, Kieran | 167 | 25 | 15% | 49 | 29% | -5 |
| Shepherd, Callum | 339 | 50 | 15% | 108 | 32% | 140 |
| Cosgrave, Pat | 166 | 24 | 14% | 60 | 36% | -38 |
| Mitchell, Jack | 263 | 38 | 14% | 99 | 38% | -40 |
| Bentley, Harry | 104 | 15 | 14% | 33 | 32% | -26 |
| Hanagan, Paul | 35 | 5 | 14% | 15 | 43% | 0 |
| Fallon, Cieren | 135 | 19 | 14% | 45 | 33% | -23 |
| Bishop, Charles | 121 | 17 | 14% | 34 | 28% | -22 |
| Fanning, Joe | 200 | 28 | 14% | 61 | 31% | -21 |
| Hogan, D E | 122 | 17 | 14% | 42 | 34% | -3 |
| Noble, Cameron | 36 | 5 | 14% | 11 | 31% | -17 |
| Lee, Clifford | 44 | 6 | 14% | 21 | 48% | 1 |
| Norton, Francis | 306 | 41 | 13% | 103 | 34% | -38 |
| Costello, Dougie | 211 | 28 | 13% | 58 | 27% | 128 |
| McCullagh, Scott | 23 | 3 | 13% | 9 | 39% | 22 |
| Ghiani, Marco | 85 | 11 | 13% | 34 | 40% | -28 |
| Dwyer, Martin | 164 | 21 | 13% | 44 | 27% | -8 |
| Bryan, Joshua | 96 | 12 | 13% | 33 | 34% | -20 |
| Watson, Jason | 169 | 21 | 12% | 69 | 41% | -57 |
| Winston, Robert | 162 | 20 | 12% | 54 | 33% | -59 |
| Crehan, Mark | 41 | 5 | 12% | 11 | 27% | -17 |
| Levey, S M | 198 | 24 | 12% | 73 | 37% | -34 |
| Cronin, S C | 42 | 5 | 12% | 16 | 38% | -16 |
| Sullivan, James P | 59 | 7 | 12% | 15 | 25% | -21 |
| Egan, David | 198 | 23 | 12% | 59 | 30% | -46 |
| Shaw, Harrison | 26 | 3 | 12% | 9 | 35% | -9 |
| Doyle, Hollie | 339 | 39 | 12% | 103 | 30% | -61 |
| Woods, Sebastian | 27 | 3 | 11% | 7 | 26% | -14 |
| Ryan, Rossa | 190 | 21 | 11% | 60 | 32% | -60 |
| Rooke, George | 91 | 10 | 11% | 28 | 31% | -18 |
| Malune, Gabriele | 119 | 13 | 11% | 38 | 32% | -1 |
| Ralston, Sophie | 55 | 6 | 11% | 16 | 29% | 5 |
| Mackay, Nicky | 101 | 11 | 11% | 34 | 34% | -41 |
| Gray, S A | 37 | 4 | 11% | 13 | 35% | -5 |
| ONeill, Dane | 84 | 9 | 11% | 27 | 32% | -33 |
| Crouch, Hector | 150 | 16 | 11% | 51 | 34% | -84 |
| Rawlinson, Ali | 194 | 20 | 10% | 63 | 32% | -43 |
| Wood, George | 185 | 19 | 10% | 55 | 30% | -28 |
| Lundie, K | 39 | 4 | 10% | 12 | 31% | -5 |
| Mathers, Patrick | 157 | 16 | 10% | 39 | 25% | -31 |
| Greatrex, Thomas | 59 | 6 | 10% | 16 | 27% | -35 |
| Turner, Hayley | 149 | 15 | 10% | 42 | 28% | -37 |
| Durcan, Ted | 20 | 2 | 10% | 5 | 25% | 12 |
| Ffrench, Royston | 20 | 2 | 10% | 6 | 30% | -10 |
| Marquand, Tom | 351 | 35 | 10% | 102 | 29% | -167 |
| Beschizza,Adam | 71 | 7 | 10% | 20 | 28% | -21 |
| Kelly, Shane | 325 | 32 | 10% | 92 | 28% | -133 |
| Probert, David | 389 | 38 | 10% | 117 | 30% | -161 |
| Dobie, Georgia | 31 | 3 | 10% | 7 | 23% | -19 |
| Morris, Luke | 803 | 76 | 9% | 205 | 26% | -319 |
| Carson, William | 223 | 21 | 9% | 50 | 22% | -42 |
| MacKenzie, Ellie | 32 | 3 | 9% | 8 | 25% | -20 |
| Naseb, Milly | 32 | 3 | 9% | 13 | 41% | -18 |
| Hornby, Rob | 183 | 17 | 9% | 41 | 22% | 5 |
| Villiers, Angus | 54 | 5 | 9% | 10 | 19% | -24 |
| Muscutt, D | 261 | 24 | 9% | 86 | 33% | -81 |
| McManoman, Faye | 22 | 2 | 9% | 5 | 23% | -7 |
| ONeill, K T | 321 | 29 | 9% | 80 | 25% | -93 |
| Greatrex, Edward | 90 | 8 | 9% | 28 | 31% | -38 |
| Tate, Ryan | 136 | 12 | 9% | 30 | 22% | -49 |
| Cherchi, Stefano | 68 | 6 | 9% | 17 | 25% | -34 |
| Donohoe, Stephen | 297 | 26 | 9% | 86 | 29% | -146 |
| Burns, Harry | 23 | 2 | 9% | 3 | 13% | -17 |
| Gordon, Josephine | 357 | 31 | 9% | 99 | 28% | -110 |
| Jones, Liam | 81 | 7 | 9% | 15 | 19% | -27 |
| Egan, John | 154 | 13 | 8% | 35 | 23% | -64 |
| Edmunds, Lewis | 108 | 9 | 8% | 27 | 25% | -53 |
| Evans, Nathan | 48 | 4 | 8% | 13 | 27% | -10 |
| Jones, A T | 73 | 6 | 8% | 15 | 21% | -32 |
To qualify a trainer has to have had a minimum of 20 runners at Chelmsford City (AW) in the last 5 years.
Top 100 Trainers
| B | W | W% | P | P% | P/L | |
| Noseda, J | 20 | 6 | 30% | 10 | 50% | 6 |
| Suroor, Saeed Bin | 186 | 53 | 28% | 95 | 51% | -14 |
| Appleby, Charlie | 91 | 24 | 26% | 50 | 55% | -32 |
| Stoute, Sir Michael | 158 | 39 | 25% | 77 | 49% | -20 |
| Gosden, J H M | 271 | 63 | 23% | 143 | 53% | -61 |
| Haggas, W J | 205 | 46 | 22% | 95 | 46% | -46 |
| Murphy, Olly | 23 | 5 | 22% | 10 | 43% | 1 |
| Beckett, R M | 103 | 22 | 21% | 42 | 41% | 33 |
| De Giles, Ed | 29 | 6 | 21% | 9 | 31% | 8 |
| Burrows, Owen | 73 | 15 | 21% | 30 | 41% | 7 |
| Teal, R A | 39 | 8 | 21% | 16 | 41% | 22 |
| Hughes, Richard | 211 | 41 | 19% | 89 | 42% | 29 |
| Pearce, Simon | 21 | 4 | 19% | 6 | 29% | 9 |
| Quinn, J J | 74 | 14 | 19% | 29 | 39% | -17 |
| Tate, James | 134 | 25 | 19% | 51 | 38% | -35 |
| Hills, Charles | 108 | 20 | 19% | 36 | 33% | 1 |
| Meade, M | 22 | 4 | 18% | 5 | 23% | 26 |
| Williams, Ian | 143 | 26 | 18% | 58 | 41% | -13 |
| Bell, M L W | 149 | 27 | 18% | 52 | 35% | 54 |
| Harris, S A | 62 | 11 | 18% | 18 | 29% | 83 |
| Crisford, Simon | 139 | 24 | 17% | 57 | 41% | -2 |
| Tuite, Joseph | 96 | 16 | 17% | 30 | 31% | -4 |
| Johnston, M | 498 | 82 | 16% | 173 | 35% | -62 |
| Simcock, D M | 304 | 50 | 16% | 110 | 36% | -47 |
| Tregoning, M P | 49 | 8 | 16% | 13 | 27% | -24 |
| Varian, Roger | 142 | 23 | 16% | 62 | 44% | -61 |
| Peckham, George | 38 | 6 | 16% | 7 | 18% | -12 |
| Cox, C G | 51 | 8 | 16% | 19 | 37% | -20 |
| Palmer, Hugo | 168 | 26 | 15% | 66 | 39% | -67 |
| Gollings, S | 26 | 4 | 15% | 12 | 46% | -4 |
| Mohammed, Ismail | 53 | 8 | 15% | 20 | 38% | 30 |
| Lycett, Shaun | 20 | 3 | 15% | 6 | 30% | -2 |
| Channon, M R | 94 | 14 | 15% | 33 | 35% | 4 |
| Usher, M D I | 142 | 21 | 15% | 50 | 35% | 7 |
| Millman, B R | 42 | 6 | 14% | 8 | 19% | 2 |
| Herrington,M | 36 | 5 | 14% | 17 | 47% | -6 |
| Dwyer, C A | 94 | 13 | 14% | 34 | 36% | -28 |
| Easterby, M W | 94 | 13 | 14% | 29 | 31% | -23 |
| Prescott, Sir Mark | 177 | 24 | 14% | 51 | 29% | -58 |
| Balding, A M | 223 | 30 | 13% | 79 | 35% | -83 |
| Charlton, R | 82 | 11 | 13% | 25 | 30% | -40 |
| Davis, D J S Ffrench | 30 | 4 | 13% | 12 | 40% | 5 |
| Williams, S C | 395 | 52 | 13% | 156 | 39% | -136 |
| Ryan, K A | 76 | 10 | 13% | 35 | 46% | -17 |
| Knight, W J | 77 | 10 | 13% | 23 | 30% | -37 |
| Powell, B G | 31 | 4 | 13% | 9 | 29% | 28 |
| Botti, M | 279 | 36 | 13% | 99 | 35% | -50 |
| Dalgleish, Keith | 31 | 4 | 13% | 9 | 29% | -6 |
| Murphy, Mike | 132 | 17 | 13% | 42 | 32% | -3 |
| Burke, K R | 55 | 7 | 13% | 23 | 42% | -11 |
| Portman, J G | 71 | 9 | 13% | 21 | 30% | 8 |
| Watson, Archie | 221 | 28 | 13% | 93 | 42% | -61 |
| Richards,s L | 24 | 3 | 13% | 8 | 33% | -7 |
| Osborne, J A | 258 | 32 | 12% | 75 | 29% | -43 |
| Newcombe, A G | 33 | 4 | 12% | 9 | 27% | 31 |
| Fox, J C | 25 | 3 | 12% | 10 | 40% | -8 |
| Keightley, S L | 100 | 12 | 12% | 27 | 27% | 20 |
| Walker, Ed | 109 | 13 | 12% | 38 | 35% | -33 |
| Moubarak, Mohamed | 76 | 9 | 12% | 23 | 30% | 114 |
| Fanshawe, J R | 104 | 12 | 12% | 42 | 40% | -53 |
| Fell, Roger | 35 | 4 | 11% | 13 | 37% | -10 |
| Cowell, R M H | 186 | 21 | 11% | 57 | 31% | -10 |
| Ivory, D K | 319 | 36 | 11% | 85 | 27% | -49 |
| Spiller, Henry | 189 | 21 | 11% | 55 | 29% | -48 |
| Boughey, George | 36 | 4 | 11% | 8 | 22% | -12 |
| Margarson, G G | 81 | 9 | 11% | 28 | 35% | -39 |
| Quinn, M | 54 | 6 | 11% | 13 | 24% | -15 |
| Dow, S | 109 | 12 | 11% | 34 | 31% | -11 |
| Scott, George | 91 | 10 | 11% | 25 | 27% | -1 |
| Muir, W R | 82 | 9 | 11% | 20 | 24% | -22 |
| Fellowes, Charlie | 111 | 12 | 11% | 35 | 32% | -32 |
| Jarvis, W | 56 | 6 | 11% | 11 | 20% | -12 |
| Appleby, M | 599 | 64 | 11% | 182 | 30% | -193 |
| Harris, R A | 38 | 4 | 11% | 10 | 26% | 3 |
| Banham, Chelsea | 57 | 6 | 11% | 17 | 30% | -30 |
| Wallis, Charlie | 276 | 29 | 11% | 76 | 28% | -57 |
| Coakley, D J | 29 | 3 | 10% | 8 | 28% | -4 |
| Guest, R C | 145 | 15 | 10% | 46 | 32% | -17 |
| Chapple-Hyam, Jane | 195 | 20 | 10% | 64 | 33% | -21 |
| Best, J R | 117 | 12 | 10% | 36 | 31% | -9 |
| Brown, D H | 59 | 6 | 10% | 20 | 34% | 37 |
| Shaw, D | 269 | 27 | 10% | 56 | 21% | -83 |
| Houghton, Eve Johnson | 50 | 5 | 10% | 13 | 26% | -24 |
| Vaughan, E F | 40 | 4 | 10% | 12 | 30% | -21 |
| Hannon (Jnr), Richard | 351 | 35 | 10% | 108 | 31% | -131 |
| Furtado, Ivan | 163 | 16 | 10% | 35 | 21% | 43 |
| Cole, P F I | 41 | 4 | 10% | 9 | 22% | -13 |
| Dunlop, E A L | 217 | 21 | 10% | 67 | 31% | -61 |
| Loughnane, Daniel Mark | 63 | 6 | 10% | 15 | 24% | -33 |
| Murphy, Amy | 126 | 12 | 10% | 29 | 23% | 8 |
| Cumani, L M | 42 | 4 | 10% | 16 | 38% | -23 |
| Sly,s P | 21 | 2 | 10% | 4 | 19% | -13 |
| Moore, G L | 126 | 12 | 10% | 38 | 30% | -73 |
| Carroll, A W | 169 | 16 | 9% | 47 | 28% | -43 |
| Lanigan, D R | 53 | 5 | 9% | 17 | 32% | -30 |
| Clover, Tom | 86 | 8 | 9% | 28 | 33% | -54 |
| Griffiths, D C | 54 | 5 | 9% | 10 | 19% | -14 |
| Guest, Rae | 108 | 10 | 9% | 28 | 26% | -47 |
| Wigham, M | 87 | 8 | 9% | 22 | 25% | -44 |
| Meehan, B J | 44 | 4 | 9% | 11 | 25% | -19 |
To qualify a jockey and trainer combination has to have teamed up in a minimum of 20 races at Chelmsford City (AW) in the last 5 years.
| Top 100 Jockey/Trainer Combinations |
| Jockey | Trainer | B | W | W% | P | P% | P/L |
| Cosgrave, Pat | Suroor, Saeed Bin | 23 | 10 | 43% | 16 | 70% | 4 |
| Dettori, L | Gosden, J H M | 23 | 9 | 39% | 15 | 65% | 4 |
| Moore, Ryan | Stoute, Sir Michael | 41 | 15 | 37% | 22 | 54% | 4 |
| Doyle, James | Palmer, Hugo | 33 | 12 | 36% | 21 | 64% | 7 |
| Kingscote, Richard | Beckett, R M | 22 | 7 | 32% | 12 | 55% | 3 |
| Atzeni, Andrea | Botti, M | 20 | 6 | 30% | 6 | 30% | 2 |
| Doyle, James | Haggas, W J | 31 | 9 | 29% | 18 | 58% | -11 |
| Havlin, Robert | Gosden, J H M | 119 | 33 | 28% | 65 | 55% | -6 |
| Hart, Jason | Quinn, J J | 40 | 11 | 28% | 19 | 48% | 1 |
| Crowley, Jim | Burrows, Owen | 33 | 9 | 27% | 15 | 45% | 12 |
| Marsh, Finley | Hughes, Richard | 30 | 8 | 27% | 17 | 57% | 12 |
| Murphy, Oisin | Suroor, Saeed Bin | 27 | 7 | 26% | 18 | 67% | -3 |
| Beasley, Connor | Guest, R C | 27 | 7 | 26% | 11 | 41% | 11 |
| Stott, Kevin | Ryan, K A | 27 | 7 | 26% | 15 | 56% | 5 |
| Murphy, Oisin | Balding, A M | 43 | 11 | 26% | 24 | 56% | 0 |
| Winston, Robert | Ivory, D K | 55 | 14 | 25% | 26 | 47% | 17 |
| Mitchell, Jack | Varian, Roger | 39 | 9 | 23% | 19 | 49% | -10 |
| Murphy, Oisin | Watson, Archie | 26 | 6 | 23% | 15 | 58% | 21 |
| Buick, William | Appleby, Charlie | 31 | 7 | 23% | 17 | 55% | -11 |
| Tate, Ryan | Prescott, Sir Mark | 32 | 7 | 22% | 9 | 28% | 24 |
| Bennett, Charlie | Harris, S A | 28 | 6 | 21% | 10 | 36% | 38 |
| McDonald, P J | Tate, James | 38 | 8 | 21% | 15 | 39% | -4 |
| Tudhope, Daniel | OMeara, D | 29 | 6 | 21% | 13 | 45% | -2 |
| McDonald, P J | Johnston, M | 58 | 12 | 21% | 21 | 36% | 13 |
| Havlin, Robert | Dunlop, E A L | 34 | 7 | 21% | 14 | 41% | 20 |
| Muscutt, D | Botti, M | 39 | 8 | 21% | 19 | 49% | 11 |
| Donohoe, Stephen | Tompkins, M H | 20 | 4 | 20% | 8 | 40% | -6 |
| Shepherd, Callum | Scott, George | 20 | 4 | 20% | 7 | 35% | 20 |
| Lane, Martin | Shaw, D | 35 | 7 | 20% | 8 | 23% | 13 |
| Morris, Luke | Walker, Ed | 25 | 5 | 20% | 9 | 36% | -5 |
| Levey, S M | Williams, S C | 35 | 7 | 20% | 19 | 54% | 9 |
| Kirby, Adam | Evans, P D | 21 | 4 | 19% | 8 | 38% | 1 |
| Walsh, E J | Newcombe, A G | 21 | 4 | 19% | 7 | 33% | 43 |
| Shepherd, Callum | McEntee, P S | 21 | 4 | 19% | 9 | 43% | 35 |
| Uys, Jordan | Williamson,s L | 21 | 4 | 19% | 9 | 43% | 3 |
| Monaghan, M M | Botti, M | 32 | 6 | 19% | 17 | 53% | 48 |
| Hogan, D E | Simcock, D M | 33 | 6 | 18% | 14 | 42% | 16 |
| Marquand, Tom | Haggas, W J | 33 | 6 | 18% | 15 | 45% | -15 |
| Spencer, Jamie | Simcock, D M | 56 | 10 | 18% | 19 | 34% | -20 |
| Greatrex, Edward | Watson, Archie | 34 | 6 | 18% | 16 | 47% | -12 |
| Fanning, Joe | Johnston, M | 109 | 19 | 17% | 36 | 33% | -18 |
| Turner, Hayley | Bell, M L W | 23 | 4 | 17% | 10 | 43% | 22 |
| Dwyer, Martin | Muir, W R | 29 | 5 | 17% | 7 | 24% | 6 |
| Kelly, Shane | Hughes, Richard | 91 | 15 | 16% | 35 | 38% | -28 |
| Norton, Francis | Johnston, M | 146 | 24 | 16% | 59 | 40% | 15 |
| Shepherd, Callum | Simcock, D M | 31 | 5 | 16% | 7 | 23% | -10 |
| ONeill, K T | Gosden, J H M | 25 | 4 | 16% | 11 | 44% | -12 |
| Sousa, Silvestre De | Dwyer, C A | 25 | 4 | 16% | 9 | 36% | 3 |
| Egan, David | Wallis, Charlie | 25 | 4 | 16% | 5 | 20% | 11 |
| Ralston, Sophie | Ivory, D K | 38 | 6 | 16% | 14 | 37% | 22 |
| Kirby, Adam | OMeara, D | 32 | 5 | 16% | 13 | 41% | -5 |
| Doyle, Hollie | Watson, Archie | 52 | 8 | 15% | 22 | 42% | -11 |
| Mitchell, Jack | Crisford, Simon | 26 | 4 | 15% | 10 | 38% | -7 |
| Donohoe, Stephen | Simcock, D M | 33 | 5 | 15% | 11 | 33% | -4 |
| Hornby, Rob | Portman, J G | 33 | 5 | 15% | 9 | 27% | 3 |
| Kelly, Shane | Murphy, Mike | 20 | 3 | 15% | 6 | 30% | 4 |
| Mitchell, Jack | Clover, Tom | 27 | 4 | 15% | 13 | 48% | -7 |
| Costello, Dougie | Osborne, J A | 82 | 12 | 15% | 27 | 33% | 14 |
| Mathers, Patrick | Shaw, D | 104 | 15 | 14% | 32 | 31% | -4 |
| Kirby, Adam | Butler, John | 21 | 3 | 14% | 8 | 38% | -4 |
| Gordon, Josephine | Keightley, S L | 50 | 7 | 14% | 14 | 28% | 21 |
| Ghiani, Marco | Williams, S C | 36 | 5 | 14% | 21 | 58% | -7 |
| Probert, David | Jenkins, J R | 22 | 3 | 14% | 6 | 27% | -1 |
| Marquand, Tom | Carroll, A W | 30 | 4 | 13% | 10 | 33% | -10 |
| Jones, A T | Williams, S C | 38 | 5 | 13% | 12 | 32% | -5 |
| Downing, George | Carroll, A W | 23 | 3 | 13% | 6 | 26% | 1 |
| Carson, William | Wallis, Charlie | 55 | 7 | 13% | 20 | 36% | 7 |
| Morris, Luke | Prescott, Sir Mark | 119 | 15 | 13% | 38 | 32% | -62 |
| Atzeni, Andrea | Varian, Roger | 32 | 4 | 13% | 14 | 44% | -21 |
| Watson, Jason | Charlton, R | 24 | 3 | 13% | 8 | 33% | -9 |
| Morris, Luke | Appleby, M | 76 | 9 | 12% | 16 | 21% | -35 |
| Norton, Francis | Wigham, M | 26 | 3 | 12% | 7 | 27% | -7 |
| Sullivan, James P | Carr,s R A | 26 | 3 | 12% | 7 | 27% | -10 |
| Wood, George | Fanshawe, J R | 44 | 5 | 11% | 21 | 48% | -26 |
| Bishop, Charles | Houghton, Eve Johnson | 27 | 3 | 11% | 6 | 22% | -18 |
| Marquand, Tom | Hannon (Jnr), Richard | 46 | 5 | 11% | 13 | 28% | -18 |
| Mackay, Nicky | Gosden, J H M | 37 | 4 | 11% | 18 | 49% | -28 |
| Doyle, Hollie | Stone, W B | 38 | 4 | 11% | 11 | 29% | -7 |
| Currie, Nicola | Osborne, J A | 57 | 6 | 11% | 17 | 30% | -20 |
| Donohoe, Stephen | Fellowes, Charlie | 57 | 6 | 11% | 17 | 30% | -14 |
| Haynes, Joey | Banham, Chelsea | 50 | 5 | 10% | 15 | 30% | -27 |
| Malune, Gabriele | Furtado, Ivan | 20 | 2 | 10% | 4 | 20% | 9 |
| Turner, Hayley | Spiller, Henry | 20 | 2 | 10% | 9 | 45% | -8 |
| ONeill, K T | Brisland, Robyn | 40 | 4 | 10% | 10 | 25% | -1 |
| ONeill, K T | Dunnett,s C A | 20 | 2 | 10% | 5 | 25% | 2 |
| Kingscote, Richard | Williams, S C | 20 | 2 | 10% | 6 | 30% | -13 |
| Tate, Ryan | Eustace, J M P | 40 | 4 | 10% | 11 | 28% | -12 |
| Dwyer, Martin | Allen, C N | 20 | 2 | 10% | 9 | 45% | 0 |
| Brock, Danny | Chapple-Hyam, Jane | 20 | 2 | 10% | 7 | 35% | -9 |
| Rawlinson, Ali | Appleby, M | 146 | 14 | 10% | 50 | 34% | -43 |
| Cox, Georgia | Haggas, W J | 21 | 2 | 10% | 6 | 29% | -14 |
| Crouch, Hector | Moore, G L | 53 | 5 | 9% | 21 | 40% | -36 |
| Donohoe, Stephen | Williams, Ian | 22 | 2 | 9% | 9 | 41% | -10 |
| Gordon, Josephine | Palmer, Hugo | 35 | 3 | 9% | 12 | 34% | -21 |
| Prince,Mr P | Guest, R C | 35 | 3 | 9% | 12 | 34% | -7 |
| Morris, Luke | Botti, M | 24 | 2 | 8% | 8 | 33% | -20 |
| Currie, Nicola | McEntee, P S | 61 | 5 | 8% | 20 | 33% | -19 |
| Duern, J | Ivory, D K | 62 | 5 | 8% | 14 | 23% | -27 |
| Evans, Nathan | Easterby, M W | 38 | 3 | 8% | 11 | 29% | -26 |
| Carson, William | Carson, Anthony | 38 | 3 | 8% | 8 | 21% | 8 |
To qualify a sires progeny needs to have run a minimum of 20 races at Chelmsford City (AW) in the last 5 years.
Top 100 Stallions
| B | W | W% | P | P% | P/L | |
| Thewayyouare (USA) | 29 | 8 | 28% | 18 | 62% | 6 |
| Frankel | 111 | 26 | 23% | 50 | 45% | -18 |
| War Command (USA) | 54 | 12 | 22% | 20 | 37% | 94 |
| War Front (USA) | 86 | 19 | 22% | 39 | 45% | 12 |
| Hard Spun (USA) | 23 | 5 | 22% | 9 | 39% | 12 |
| Declaration Of War (USA) | 62 | 13 | 21% | 26 | 42% | -19 |
| Dubawi (IRE) | 178 | 36 | 20% | 66 | 37% | -26 |
| Lope De Vega (IRE) | 183 | 37 | 20% | 71 | 39% | 33 |
| Mehmas (IRE) | 20 | 4 | 20% | 9 | 45% | 7 |
| More Than Ready (USA) | 35 | 7 | 20% | 12 | 34% | 10 |
| Denounce | 25 | 5 | 20% | 8 | 32% | 18 |
| Sea The Stars (IRE) | 112 | 22 | 20% | 39 | 35% | -20 |
| Quality Road (USA) | 21 | 4 | 19% | 8 | 38% | 5 |
| City Zip (USA) | 21 | 4 | 19% | 8 | 38% | 2 |
| Haatef (USA) | 21 | 4 | 19% | 8 | 38% | 12 |
| Speightstown (USA) | 58 | 11 | 19% | 27 | 47% | 7 |
| Multiplex | 58 | 11 | 19% | 23 | 40% | 16 |
| Charm Spirit (IRE) | 85 | 16 | 19% | 32 | 38% | 0 |
| Fastnet Rock (AUS) | 102 | 19 | 19% | 39 | 38% | 1 |
| Rock Of Gibraltar (IRE) | 87 | 16 | 18% | 35 | 40% | 7 |
| Maxios | 22 | 4 | 18% | 8 | 36% | 4 |
| Siyouni (FR) | 66 | 12 | 18% | 24 | 36% | -17 |
| Farhh | 28 | 5 | 18% | 14 | 50% | 1 |
| Blame (USA) | 28 | 5 | 18% | 10 | 36% | 7 |
| Aussie Rules (USA) | 62 | 11 | 18% | 19 | 31% | -7 |
| Zamindar (USA) | 40 | 7 | 18% | 11 | 28% | -1 |
| Power | 63 | 11 | 17% | 27 | 43% | -6 |
| Dragon Pulse (IRE) | 69 | 12 | 17% | 27 | 39% | -21 |
| Distorted Humor (USA) | 29 | 5 | 17% | 11 | 38% | -8 |
| Street Cry (IRE) | 95 | 16 | 17% | 36 | 38% | 38 |
| Kittens Joy (USA) | 43 | 7 | 16% | 16 | 37% | -18 |
| Morpheus | 43 | 7 | 16% | 17 | 40% | -1 |
| Le Havre (IRE) | 31 | 5 | 16% | 8 | 26% | -1 |
| Makfi | 56 | 9 | 16% | 21 | 38% | -11 |
| Gleneagles (IRE) | 56 | 9 | 16% | 24 | 43% | -8 |
| Anjaal | 25 | 4 | 16% | 9 | 36% | 1 |
| Sea The Moon (GER) | 69 | 11 | 16% | 21 | 30% | -14 |
| Leroidesanimaux (BRZ) | 69 | 11 | 16% | 23 | 33% | -15 |
| New Approach (IRE) | 114 | 18 | 16% | 36 | 32% | 15 |
| Mastercraftsman (IRE) | 172 | 27 | 16% | 57 | 33% | -30 |
| Big Bad Bob (IRE) | 51 | 8 | 16% | 17 | 33% | 18 |
| Muhaarar | 51 | 8 | 16% | 17 | 33% | -30 |
| Outstrip | 45 | 7 | 16% | 15 | 33% | -13 |
| Medaglia Doro (USA) | 26 | 4 | 15% | 11 | 42% | -8 |
| Heeraat (IRE) | 39 | 6 | 15% | 11 | 28% | -4 |
| Dalakhani (IRE) | 26 | 4 | 15% | 8 | 31% | -12 |
| Foxwedge (AUS) | 137 | 21 | 15% | 43 | 31% | 45 |
| Starspangledbanner (AUS) | 33 | 5 | 15% | 7 | 21% | 5 |
| Cape Cross (IRE) | 172 | 26 | 15% | 63 | 37% | -39 |
| Dick Turpin (IRE) | 73 | 11 | 15% | 28 | 38% | -10 |
| Arakan (USA) | 20 | 3 | 15% | 3 | 15% | -3 |
| Lord Shanakill (USA) | 20 | 3 | 15% | 4 | 20% | 1 |
| Golden Horn | 40 | 6 | 15% | 18 | 45% | 19 |
| Oasis Dream | 234 | 35 | 15% | 72 | 31% | -20 |
| Australia | 74 | 11 | 15% | 25 | 34% | -39 |
| Dylan Thomas (IRE) | 27 | 4 | 15% | 8 | 30% | 6 |
| Scat Daddy (USA) | 41 | 6 | 15% | 17 | 41% | -12 |
| Coach House (IRE) | 55 | 8 | 15% | 14 | 25% | 19 |
| So You Think (NZ) | 21 | 3 | 14% | 7 | 33% | -14 |
| Night Of Thunder (IRE) | 35 | 5 | 14% | 18 | 51% | -17 |
| Shamardal (USA) | 191 | 27 | 14% | 67 | 35% | -85 |
| Invincible Spirit (IRE) | 272 | 38 | 14% | 95 | 35% | -53 |
| Elzaam (AUS) | 43 | 6 | 14% | 11 | 26% | -13 |
| Kendargent (FR) | 58 | 8 | 14% | 20 | 34% | 0 |
| Dandy Man (IRE) | 218 | 30 | 14% | 74 | 34% | -32 |
| Lethal Force (IRE) | 124 | 17 | 14% | 39 | 31% | -11 |
| Dark Angel (IRE) | 410 | 56 | 14% | 142 | 35% | -111 |
| Slade Power (IRE) | 66 | 9 | 14% | 21 | 32% | 25 |
| Garswood | 66 | 9 | 14% | 20 | 30% | -13 |
| Mukhadram | 88 | 12 | 14% | 32 | 36% | -29 |
| Twilight Son | 22 | 3 | 14% | 6 | 27% | -10 |
| Delegator | 88 | 12 | 14% | 27 | 31% | 49 |
| Dutch Art | 222 | 30 | 14% | 67 | 30% | -70 |
| Holy Roman Emperor (IRE) | 142 | 19 | 13% | 49 | 35% | 27 |
| Arcano (IRE) | 121 | 16 | 13% | 36 | 30% | -22 |
| Sayif (IRE) | 31 | 4 | 13% | 9 | 29% | 4 |
| Champs Elysees | 179 | 23 | 13% | 60 | 34% | -63 |
| Alhebayeb (IRE) | 32 | 4 | 13% | 6 | 19% | -15 |
| Dansili | 136 | 17 | 13% | 51 | 38% | -57 |
| Elusive City (USA) | 32 | 4 | 13% | 11 | 34% | -15 |
| Assertive | 57 | 7 | 12% | 20 | 35% | 18 |
| Roderic OConnor (IRE) | 57 | 7 | 12% | 19 | 33% | -25 |
| Nathaniel (IRE) | 115 | 14 | 12% | 35 | 30% | -29 |
| Society Rock (IRE) | 115 | 14 | 12% | 35 | 30% | -27 |
| Tagula (IRE) | 25 | 3 | 12% | 6 | 24% | -11 |
| Cacique (IRE) | 42 | 5 | 12% | 14 | 33% | -17 |
| Ravens Pass (USA) | 110 | 13 | 12% | 34 | 31% | -39 |
| Archipenko (USA) | 119 | 14 | 12% | 29 | 24% | -41 |
| Harbour Watch (IRE) | 128 | 15 | 12% | 34 | 27% | -23 |
| Showcasing | 215 | 25 | 12% | 62 | 29% | -48 |
| Sir Prancealot (IRE) | 138 | 16 | 12% | 43 | 31% | -32 |
| Gale Force Ten | 26 | 3 | 12% | 6 | 23% | -12 |
| No Nay Never (USA) | 61 | 7 | 11% | 24 | 39% | 24 |
| Excellent Art | 70 | 8 | 11% | 14 | 20% | 28 |
| Azamour (IRE) | 35 | 4 | 11% | 7 | 20% | 12 |
| Dawn Approach (IRE) | 98 | 11 | 11% | 31 | 32% | -58 |
| Exceed And Excel (AUS) | 357 | 40 | 11% | 109 | 31% | -102 |
| Cityscape | 63 | 7 | 11% | 11 | 17% | 64 |
| Dabirsim (FR) | 27 | 3 | 11% | 9 | 33% | -14 |
| Captain Rio | 36 | 4 | 11% | 8 | 22% | -7 |
© 2021, One Stop Racing. All rights reserved.